Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Amsterdam Marathon
Back

Amsterdam Marathon - Race Reviews

3.9
Average rating based on 88 Reviews

By: Christina V.

Posted: October 16, 2023

Great destination race

If you are looking for an easier race in Europe this is the race for you. Course relatively flat a bit narrow in spots which make it a little tough for a perfect PR attempt. Weather this time of year usually cooperates with the exception of a hail storm + major downpour 30 minutes before the start. Course is scenic but does not go through city center but around outer portion. Running through Rijks museum tunnel was very cool. Spectators at end were fantastic and finishing in the Olympic stadium was amazing. A well known DJ played which is great for Spectators waiting for their runners.
4.0

By: Sebastian d.

Posted: October 22, 2022

Crowded with spectacular finish

The start is very well organised. The bagage drop-off allows any type of bag and is secure and easy to use. Lots of toilets around the stadium and if you arrive on time you shouldn't have to wait too long. The course itself is pancake flat but the streets are very narrow which makes it hard to overtake and I ended up being behind a big group for most part of the race. Especially the part around the Amstel river is very narrow. The crowds are OK I would say and most of the race has not many spectators and I think this has to do with the fact that the course doesn't go through the city center. The last 5k is where you really notice the crowds and they will help you push for the the final part of the marathon. The finish in the Olympic Stadium is amazing with all the people in the stands and I will forever remember this moment. Overall it's a great race to run a PR.
3.0

By: Mateo A.

Posted: October 24, 2019

Crowded But Fast Course

Amsterdam offers nice sights, great crowd support, and a well-run event. However, a stadium start and narrow streets make for a crowded course. Even so, cool temperatures and a flat course with few turns make for a recommendable race.
5.0

By: Jessica S.

Posted: October 21, 2019

Lackluster Race

The course was nice, but on the whole this race was a letdown. I live in Amsterdam, and I'm very glad I didn't make a special trip for this - it's not worth it unless you're already planning to be in the Netherlands. The course was poorly supported with many gels/energy drinks running out quickly, leaving most of us with just banana pieces and water for the 1st 15K. It felt like they paid more attention to entertainment than actual race support. The porta-potties were nice to have though. The crowds were dull - most people only turn out to cheer for a specific person/group and then leave. Perhaps the worst bit, I used 3 separate trackers and all had me finishing 1k before the official finish - which means my 'official' time is 6 minutes slower than my actual finishing time.
2.0

By: Charles S.

Posted: April 22, 2019

Enjoyable run

I had a great time in Amsterdam. For Americans considering going, everyone spoke English and were very friendly. Great city to visit. Easy to get around. The course was OK touching the fringe of the outer canal and then heading into a farming area where I saw my first legit windmill. I loved the start and finish in the Olympic Stadium; however, it is very crowded and getting in and out of the stadium is challenging. The port-o-urinals was a great idea and something I'd wish they do in the USA to cut down on standing in line and open urination. I'm glad I went, would do it again. Great destination marathon. Smallish expo, nice shirt (although I'm not a shirt/medal guy).
4.0

By: Joe R.

Posted: October 27, 2018

good run, but there's room for improvement

Pros: super-flat course nice finish in the Olympic stadium Amsterdam is a great city reasonably-priced entry fee it's a good course, with only a bit of out-and-back (mostly at the river, and it's along the other side) Cons: the medals are terrible (and they look the same for the marathon, the 1/2, and the 8K) the t-shirts are ugly too the marathon expo is nothing special, but I don't really like them anyways it's bottlenecked for the first few miles, partly since the road there is split for the out-and-back, so all runners are crammed into a single lane water stations are every 5K (maybe that's Euro-standard, but Americans are used to more) if you finish in <4hrs, expect to fight your way through 20K half-marathoners (who run in the afternoon) when going from the finish area to the subway relatively more Europeans don't believe in deodorant (compared to the US), so expect to get some unpleasant whiffs the post-race is very disappointing, with a cup of water, a bottle of a gross orange energy drink, and a granola bar tips: buy your roundtrip subway cards beforehand so that you don't get stuck in a really long queue on raceday the bag check is secure (that wasn't clear from the website); any bag will do, and they'll put a numbered sticker on it (with a matching one on your bib)
3.0

By: Simonas B.

Posted: June 20, 2017

Flat boring course with average organization

It is fun, that course starts and finishes at Olympic stadium, but actually good part is only the finish. Start procedure is very crowded and difficult as stadium is too small for such number of people. Course is flat, as promised, but very boring. In the middle of the race you have to run ~20km literally in the middle of nowhere, with small support and boring views. It is getting better just last 5km. Organization is not top notch, some parts market not clear, medal is a joke (worst I have in my collection, even counting all 5K races), no finishers buffet at all. Also take note, Amsterdam is crowded and hotels are expensive during the marathon. Still, you could expect quite high temperatures if you are running more than 3 hours.
3.0

By: vanessa r.

Posted: October 20, 2016

Good course, bad organisation

I ran Amsterdam marathon just last Sunday. That was my 5th marathon after New-York, Paris etc.. PROS: easy and flat route, as promised. Nice sightseeing, and lovely finish in the stadium. CONS: not the best organisation I have seen. Street signages to get there were very confusing, not clear enough. The water and food stations were messy. The crowd is not the most excited one I have seen... but it gets better on the last 2 km. The worse for me was at the finish: you don't even get a bottle of water, or a proper cereal bar. No you just get a poor plastic cup, and only small bits of cereals bars or banana. No goodies bags, nothing. As if we just ran 10 k, not 42. Last but not least: the route is actually 42,6 km, and not 42,2. Which can make a difference of 2 to 3 min on a personal best. The whole thing looked cheap and un-organised. TCS used to do things better than that. I probably won't do it again.
3.0

By: ivan t.

Posted: October 17, 2016

Missing information

Course is fine except for the cobblestone part which is smooth enough but not my favorite surface. Streets around the stadium were closed for ALL traffic starting hours before the race. As a result, I (and MANY others) had to walk about 3 km. But the really bad part was that we were not notified that this is the case, waited on the tram stop until it became clear that nothing is coming and then walked (or ran) to the stadium; I was lucky to have gotten up very early but I wonder how many runners missed the start because of this. Otherwise, the organization was good. I was somewhat disappointed and surprised that in addition to the medal I only got an energy drink after the finish line and nothing else. Did I miss something? Spectators were very supportive, especially the last few kilometers. They were there even when I arrived, which was hours and hours after the winners :-(
4.0

By: Angie G.

Posted: October 31, 2015

Fast and flat

I really liked this course, it is broken up into different sections - the run along the river followed by the business district etc. Start and finish in the stadium are great - love the techno music. Some bits have few spectators but that doesn't bother me. A pb course if you can avoid the odd bottleneck near the start.
5.0

By: Zach Zulkowsky

Posted: October 26, 2015

Ideal for those seeking a PR or a small field

I had the pleasure of running in the 2015 TCS Amsterdam Marathon. I'll admit that having read the less than enthusiastic reviews beforehand, I was a bit apprehensive going into this race. For those looking for a race with the energy of NYC, Chicago, London, etc. this may not be the race for you. The field is noticeably smaller than the larger marathons, and the course goes through some pretty quiet patches in regards to spectators. That being said, I will say that after having ran in the big city marathons, I found it refreshing to find myself running in the countryside amongst some spectacular scenery. Like I mentioned above, there were some spots that were sparsely populated by crowds; however, when there were crowds they were extremely supportive and raucous! The course is also extremely flat, which makes it ideal for those seeking that PR or Boston qualifier. In regards to things that could be worked on, the thing that stands out in my mind the most is the fact that the aid stations were only on one side of the road, which lead to some bottlenecking and some runners getting tripped up. Also, the solar blankets at the end, were not in fact solar blankets, but merely sheets of plastic that did little to shield one from the chill and the rain coming down post-race. Overall I'd recommend this marathon to anyone, from first time marathoner to seasoned veteran. Great job to the organizers for showcasing the charm and scenery of Amsterdam!
4.0

By: chris p.

Posted: October 23, 2014

love the olympic stadium

Great city, Great crowd. Some parts of the course can be a bit dull but the start and finish in the Olympic stadium are amazing.
4.0

By: S. S.

Posted: October 21, 2014

Lots of potential, but rather mediocre

Signed up for the full, but ended up running the half (due to injury). This race has so much potential. Great city, good signage, etc - however, I found it to be a bit amateur (when compared to other big races I've done). PROS: Nice start and finish inside Olympic Stadium. Flat (flat!) course and easy terrain (no cobblestone, or terribly narrow bits, etc). Fair amount of water stations; liked the sponges. Lots of nice music/bands along the way. CONS: The expo was rather boring. Little energy and the branded marathon gear was rather pathetic (and quite overpriced!). The course itself included very few real 'sights.' No canals or scenic spots that made me feel as though I was running somewhere unique/historic. Also long stretches with no crowds whatsoever. Water stations were only on one side of the road, which doesn't bother me tremendously, but can cause some serious bottlenecks. The finish line was a real letdown. No recovery drink for over 30 minutes and only after waiting in two long lines to exit the stadium. We were given one bottle of drink, half a banana and ONE orange wedge (I was yelled at when I grabbed two wedges, then forced to put it back, even when I indicated that I'd wrapped my fingers around it). We were then herded on like sheep and out of the finishers area. Having run London, Dublin, Boston, Honolulu, Philadelphia, Prague, Vienna, Paris - this race was a bit disappointing. Thankfully, it was a beautiful weekend to be in Amsterdam and the city itself made me thankful that I'd signed up. Don't think I'll do it again however.
3.0

By: Dave Y.

Posted: October 20, 2014

Well organised race

Flat course but hard to break PB due to a lot of bottlenecks at water stations etc. Great crowd support. Only downside is the public transport. Not enough trains run on the Metro.
4.0

By: James Skinner

Posted: December 11, 2012

European classic with an Olympic theme

The Amsterdam Marathon is long established with this being the 37th edition. The Dutch seem to pride themselves on their organisation and this is one slick event. Entries in the marathon distance vary between 12,000 and 15,000 runners. However, when combined with the half marathon and 8km events, that figure rises to around 37,000. Importantly, the marathon is kept completely separate from the other events. Similar to the Vienna City Marathon, it was possible to download an app to your mobile phone in the week preceding the race, providing every conceivable piece of information. The registration expo is also efficient, taking place at a large sports exhibition hall out beside the 1928 Olympic Stadium, on the south western fringe of the city. The Olympic Stadium is where the start and finish for the marathon are located, so it was helpful visualising this at the time of the registration process. The only criticism would be that due to its peripheral location, getting to and from the expo does take time. Meanwhile, the event merchandise is nice with Mizuno acting as the official technical supplier. The weather forecast ahead of the event was very mixed. Thankfully, it settled down in time and race day conditions were not as bad as feared, with it generally being a grey, overcast autumnal day. There were a few spots of rain, but nothing significant. However, the main issue was a biting cross-wind that knocked the temperature down significantly and running into this wind was hard work. The temperature all day hovered around 12C / 54F, but the real feel was well down on this. The course is somewhat disappointing. The highlights being the start and finish area inside the Olympic Stadium. You complete half a lap at the start, before exiting the stadium, whilst at the finish; you do the same again, albeit in front of thousands of cheering spectators. Unfortunately, due to the intrinsic network of canals running through the heart of Amsterdam, the course tends to take place very much within the city suburbs and along the River Amstel, which feeds the city. One highlight during the race was running through Vondelpark, the largest and most famous park in Amsterdam. The stretch along the river was the toughest, not due to the terrain, which is pretty much flat throughout the course, but down to the aforementioned strong cross-wind. Runners were very exposed, with absolutely no cover at all. Had it been pouring with rain, then conditions would have been brutal. If you are looking to post a personal best (PB) time, then Amsterdam is perfectly set-up for this. However, you will need the weather to be on your side for running conditions to suit. Combine the history of the event, the superb organisation, the welcoming Dutch people, together with the prospect of posting a fast time and it is clear to see why the Amsterdam Marathon comes recommended. The event appears to be growing and going from strength to strength with every passing year.
4.0

By: Robert F.

Posted: November 19, 2012

Fast and flat marathon. Great course for a PB

I agree with all the other 2012 comments. I really enjoyed this one and got a PB 11 minutes faster than my previous. The tram situation is shocking. We took a taxi. Great course, great spectators. Start and finish in Olympic stadium is epic. Amsterdam is an amazing place. I would highly recommend this one.
5.0

By: Colin G.

Posted: November 01, 2012

Good big city event but too congested for PB

I ran the 2012 race having previously ran this in 2005. Though the organisation is good, with plenty of drink stations, sponges, etc., I noticed a lot of congestion and pinching causing runners to stop in some places along the course. This most affects 'mid pack' runners expecting to finish around 3.30-4.00hrs. Its all fine if you're running for the pleasure of it but frustrating if you're looking to get a PB on what would otherwise a fast and flat course. I guess that faster runners will not experience the same problems of crowding. In my opinion the race has too many people crammed into some narrow streets and should be rerouted. Would I do it again- perhaps, but if you're only doing one European race -- go for Berlin... It's perfect.
3.0

By: Alice B.

Posted: October 23, 2012

Great race for a PR

Pros: -Flat and fast: No exaggeration here, there is, at most, one ramp at an incline. That's it! -Large expo -Well-stocked and frequent aid stations -Very thrilling to start and finish in the Olympic Stadium. -Well-organized gear check -Great place to visit! Cons: -The course was not quite as stunning as some of the other reviews make it out to be. The parts in the city parks were very nice, as was the 15K or so along the Amstel, but the course also goes through some residential and industrial areas, and does not really go into central Amsterdam. Not a huge deal, but be prepared that parts of the course are very boring. -There were frequent bottlenecks at the start of the course, partly from the narrowness of the streets, partly from the fact that the starting corrals did not do a particularly good job of sorting people by pace. (The starting groups are in 30 minute increments, so that someone who runs a 3:30 is in the same area as someone who runs a 3:00.) -There was not enough food at the end. You were allowed one quarter of an orange, and one half of a banana. -The morning of the marathon the trams and buses completely shut down, even with routes that do not appear to go along the course. This goes more under the classification of a warning than a complaint, but plan to walk, bike, or take a cab to the nearest metro stop. (For us, it was 2.5 km, and although we left plenty of time, we had to rush to get there because of this.)
4.0

By: Stefan S.

Posted: November 02, 2011

Fast, flat, excellent organisation

Brilliant. The course starts and finishes in the old Olympic stadium, makes you feel like a hero! This year there were just under 10,000 runners, so it felt like a bit city event but still small and friendly. Course is interesting, a scenic run through the park and down the Amstel river and then back into town. Only dull point was a kind of business/industrial area around km32. Crowd support was good but not massive. But generally I was very pleasantly surprised at how friendly, laid back and welcoming the atmosphere was. 2011 was blessed with absolutely perfect weather (sunshine, cool temps and gentle breeze). In the wind and rain it would have been a different story.. a bit miserable perhaps. The course is flat, except a little underpass at km35. Finishing in the Olympic stadium was really special. Race t-shirt was excellent quality. Race results give you nice stats and diagrams. Race photos and videos were good. The expo was nice enough but didn't hang around to be honest. A package arrived in the post before the race and with it came discount vouchers for the tram system, a nice thought. All in all I though organisation was first rate. Everyone I knew who ran it PB'd on the course, myself included. Absolutely loved the event and would not hesitate to recommend it as a fast, flat & friendly autumn marathon.
5.0

By: Brett A.

Posted: October 24, 2011

The place to BQ or PR

Strongly consider Amsterdam if you are chasing a Boston time or PR, want a European destination race or to celebrate at the finish with family and friends. The majority of marathon entrants are from outside the Netherlands, giving the global feel of a London or Paris in a much smaller (and more manageable) field. It also means this race anticipates the needs and concerns of visitors to a higher degree. Website and email communications earn high grades. The envelope with the competitor letter (for number pickup), which arrived in plenty of time, also had a detailed course map and tram-subway discount coupon. Expo pickup went smoothly and the arena was filled with a variety of exhibitors. Several Italian restaurants in the Leidseplein (tram lines 1, 2, 5) are terrific for pre-race dinner. The only significant race-day problem was with the trams, which was outside the race directors control. The GVB re-routed the 16 as the main transport to the Olympic Stadium, but there were not nearly enough trams in service on that line. In a 35-minute period, five full trams passed the Leidseplein station without stopping. At 8:20 a.m. a supervisor in a GVB car stopped, and looking a bit panicked apologized for the big problem before continuing toward the stadium. At that point I doubled back to the hotel and shared a cab with another runner (14 euro with tip). We reached the stadium in plenty of time but leaving the room much earlier than normal proved beneficial. Leave extra time for entering the stadium, too. All runners funnel through the main entrance (you run through it entering and leaving) so there's a logjam. There were plenty of portable toilets and urinals along the track, the ones outside the stadium are not the only option. As noted, the bag drop was inconvenient; it's not by last-name letter or bib number so find the shortest line at any tent. The course is flat, fast and scenic and the kilometers really do fly past. There were no pace runners, instead you received a target-time pace band that's color-coded for corral entry. The km signage could use an upgrade, there is a meter-high sandwich board at each km, easily obstructed. Teardrop banners would increase visibility and provide additional sponsor signage. As noted, there are places where the course is incredibly narrow, in some spots 2 meters wide. There are a number of curbs, tram rails, traffic islands and other street furniture that cut into the course, and there were a few stretches where spectators ignored the barricades and stepped into the street. If you remain aware you'll be fine. Most of the southbound portion beside the Amstel (14-19k) is a one-lane road, but the return (19-25k) is a narrower exercise trail. Use your head, pass when the opportunity presents itself, simply churn out the km in this section and you'll be fine. As a bonus, there were a few boats on the river blasting out music, which was a nice touch. The fluid stations have plenty of supplies and would operate more efficiently if volunteers stayed beside the tables to hand out cups instead of walking a few paces into the street. Better yet would be the volunteers staying behind the tables and allowing runners to grab their own cups. Starting in the Olympic Stadium is one thing, finishing there is tremendous. It's a rush to run into a bowl jammed with thousands of raucous spectators, including anyone who has accompanied you on the trip. Logging a PR by nearly five minutes and a first Boston qualifying time is fantastic, but looking up in the stands and seeing my better half cheering like crazy was one of the best moments we'll ever share. If you are sightseeing the next day, consider online advance ticket orders for the Anne Frank, Rijksmuseum, Stedelik and/or Van Gogh. The ticket lines that day are longer than a usual Monday (30 minutes at the Van Gogh mid-morning) but you gain immediate entry with an advance ticket. Your legs will thank you.
5.0

By: Bastiaan S.

Posted: October 22, 2011

Great to be back in Amsterdam!

Starting and finishing in the oldest olympic stadium, which is still in its original state, is quite astonishing in its own right! Add to that Amsterdam, flat course, great organization and you are in for a real treat. Weather was phenomenal in 2011 (55c, sunny, no wind) and guaranteed a good time..
5.0

By: Michael B.

Posted: October 21, 2011

Amsterdam - Ik hou van jou!

If you're looking for a well organised, flat/fast course with lovely surroundings, you can't go far wrong with this marathon. The start and finish in the Olympisch Stadion is a real buzz! The first 1km is quite tight leaving the stadium and also on the narrow streets at first but it quickly thins out, especially if you're running 3 hours pace. The aid stations are well stocked and come thick and fast. The volunteers do an amazing job and were very supportive, which is much needed in the last 10km of the race. The crowds are plenty in the urban sections of the race but support is a little thin running along the Amstel and then again between 25km and 30km (the only ugly section of the course). This is where runners really need to be mentally strong. It's ugly with little or no crowd support. Hang in there though, post 30km the crowds start to appear again and can help push you through to the finish. Make sure you save something for het Vondelpark, it's got some inclines at 39/40km. Overall the race itself is a real gem. Those of you looking to run a PB or fast time, this marathon is as flat as a pancake. I was a little undertrained and overweight for my normal marathon condition yet still managed to run my second fastest marathon time ever finishing a cruel 6 seconds behind my PB. We were lucky with the weather too, 12c, no wind and dry. I would recommend to anyone doing this next year to arrive at the Olympisch Stadion early as the bag drop can take a while. Also, do not be confused by the letters at the bag drop tents. These are not corresponding to surnames, runners can drop their bag off at any stall. The volunteers will give you sticker to put on your bib. Pick up is simple post race. The only real complaint I have is that the Marathon Expo is not at all well sign-posted from the metro when picking up the bib number. The expo itself is quite poor. There are quite a few stalls but mainly of low quality brands selling cheap and/or surplus stock. Overall though Amsterdam is a fantastic race and lovely city to see post race. Highly recommended. Will definately be going back in the future.
4.0

By: Dominic McCarter

Posted: December 24, 2010

Enjoyable, but some faults.

Overall, a very enjoyable race. As you would expect in Holland, a very flat course. The segment out along the Amstel River was not as dull as I'd feared, and the kilometers just fly by, but the course at the start when exiting the stadium and heading through the Vondelpark are very narrow, making running dificult in the opening sector, and the bag deposit for such a large field was so incredibly disorganized that despite joining the queue a half hour before the start I still almost missed the start. But these are minor quibbles over what was a very enjoyable run.
3.0

By: Zer Z.

Posted: October 26, 2010

Overwhelmingly positive experience!

In nearly every respect this was an excellent marathon and one that I enjoyed very much. I don't share the two criticisms below. For me, the bag-drop was very easy to find and use, being located in a huge marquee right by the way in. I suspect, though, that it may have been more difficult to locate if one didn't use the suggested route from the metro station via the Sporthallen, and it may not have been signposted from the other direction. And, at the end I was offered banana, orange, water, AA drink, a native Dutch energy bar (can't remember the name)... lots of things. And you could buy sandwiches and other food in the stadium bar. (And HOT CHOCOLATE!!) Personally, I'd have liked a muffin, but never mind! Great course; fast; attractive scenery; excellent crowd. Highlights: the live band on a river boat; the djembe group; the DJ at the stadium. Mostly good running surface (though there were a few potholes and rocks on the road - I nearly twisted my ankle on one that was not the organizers' fault). Fantastic city. Good camaraderie with other runners and a very supportive crowd. Weather was absolutely perfect. Transportation was very easy and cheap, not least the metro on race day. All highly recommended! A few minor criticisms. The official sports drink, AA, was not good. Even the label said, "for after exercise" - not ideal, I'd think! And it didn't taste great, in my view. The water stations were plentiful and well spaced, but I had a few problems with them. Firstly, they always seemed to be at narrow stretches, so the bunching up was bad! Secondly, there was no labeling of where to get water, AA or fruit, so many people ended up making a grab for whatever they could see. (They were always in the same order but it wasn't clear where the boundaries were.) People who wanted water were getting AA. Lastly, the drinks were given over in plastic cups. Highly impractical because it's very hard to drink and you lose a lot on the floor. You certainly can't carry the thing for more than a hundred paces so no good if you want a drink in a mile. Why not bottles?!?! Luckily some legenday residents had set up independent water stalls at intervals between official ones. Hats off to them - they saved my bacon! In summary: Everyone should do Amsterdam once. I thought it was brilliant!
4.0

By: Sven J.

Posted: October 22, 2010

Getting better!

This was the second time I ran "Amsterdam." It has gone through a marked improvement. The number of runners completing the marathon has doubled in recent years to 10,000+, but more importantly the number of spectators has hugely increased. Amsterdam always had a reputation for being a race devoid of spectators, but no more... the crowds were out and very enthusiastic. This made the race very pleasurable to run. The course is flat, fast and comes past some choice spots. On the negative side: no goody bag, and as others have noted, very few refreshments at the finish - just a single bottle, some pieces of banana and orange parts....
4.0

By: Alex M.

Posted: October 21, 2010

That was a good one!

This race was excellent! The course is great, flat and fast, through a large and pretty part of the city itself, and then along the rivers and parks, past two old windmills. The spectators were very enthusiastic and cheerful. The expo was quite a decent size, and in general, I enjoyed the race very much. Unfortunately, there are a couple of negative comments about the organization. At the start I could not easily figure out where to deposit my bag and ended up asking some Japanese support group to keep it with them for me. Also, at the finish I would expect more food and drinks. I was given a small bottle of the sport drink and when I asked for the second one I was given a dirty look instead. It is OK, so I drank more water.
5.0

By: Richard Cross

Posted: October 18, 2010

Beautiful weather, fast course

Great to be able to run in Amsterdam at last. We had perfect weather: 10C, very bright sun, and a small breeze from the coast. The course took us through Vondel Park, headed south down alongside the Amstel River. The barges going up and down the river blasting out music were great fun, even if I had my head down for a fast time. Generally, running congestion was never bad. I didn't like the paper cups at the drinks station, but I found that by stopping to drink I got more water in me than over me; I didn't cough and splutter, and I only lost 10 meters on the people in front. All in all, OK. The stadium finish was brilliant, and the photo and video service was quick and comprehensive. After-race food and drink was limited to be honest. But I PB'd by 13 minutes and broke 3 hours for the first time. I loved this race. Hartelijk bedankt naar de Nederlanders!
4.0

By: Saradhi R.

Posted: January 13, 2010

Flat, friendly and well organized

Hard to find fault with this race. It was extremely well organized, the course is very flat, and although spectators are sparse, they make their presence felt. Getting to and from the race by tram was very easy. Finish line to hotel room in the city center took fewer than 35 minutes. The stadium finish was very inspiring. Easy to find space to run right from the gun.
5.0

By: Joe R.

Posted: October 28, 2009

My first marathon and still one of my favorites

I've done the full marathon once and the half marathon course once as well. This is a nice race through a beautiful, flat city. The full marathon and half marathon start at different times but end at the same time (that is, the slowest marathoners will finish about the same time as the slowest half marathoners). Vondelpark is beautiful, and the city supports the race well. And you can't beat Amsterdam for post-race fun!
5.0

By: Terrie Greene

Posted: October 26, 2009

VERY WELL ORGANIZED, FAST RACE

Great expo. The start and finish at the Olympic Stadium were great. I would have liked to have started earlier. Race began at 10:30 a.m. The weather was great. The Amstel River part of the marathon was beautiful, with farm animals and beautiful Dutch Estates. It's a great, great city and a wonderful marathon. I wouldn't suggest this marathon for first-timers. It moves at quite a fast pace. I finished 4:56 and was in the back of the pack. A lot of runners never finished because they ran too fast in the beginning and hit the wall. The volunteers, water supply, Gatorade, sponges, and fruit were very plentiful. The field was mostly men. Highly recommend this marathon.
5.0

By: Robert R.

Posted: October 25, 2009

A good overall experience

Whilst the riverside section was a little depressing (if only because it was a bit quiet, and the farther you ran out, you knew you had to come back!), the course is a good, flat one. The finish in the Olympic Stadium is great, and the whole thing was pretty well organized. Add in the fact that Amsterdam is a great city to visit, and I'd certainly recommend it.
4.0

By: Mikkel Lund

Posted: October 19, 2009

Very good first experience on the full distance

Fantastic atmosphere at the Olympic Stadium, both at the start and the finish - great sensation. Good trick with the first loop through the park, so you know how long you have left the second time around. Beautiful course (and weather), at least for the first 25K - especially along the Amstel, with the cheering boats. It was very well organized, with good transportation, secure bag-check, and depots every 5K. Only my own preparation could have made it a better experience.
5.0

By: Steve B.

Posted: October 28, 2008

Great race; nice, flat course; enthusiastic fans

This was my 9th marathon, and I enjoyed every minute of it. It's a nice, flat course, and to be honest, it was more scenic than some of the other city marathons done. Although the fans were lacking in numbers, they made up for it in enthusiasm; finishing in the Olympic Stadium was a great buzz. I had no problem with transportation; I simply took the Metro form Central Station on race-day, as I was staying in the city center. I had a great weekend, enjoyed the city and got a PB as well. What more can you ask for? I'll definitely do this one again.
4.0

By: philip colet

Posted: October 26, 2008

Great race, great course, average fans

This was a great race. It was very well organized and is a mostly scenic course through Vondel Park, parts of Amsterdam and along the Amstel River in what seems like the countryside. Fans were not that numerous and were sporadic, but where present, they were very enthusiastic. This is a large race with close to 8,000 runners, and it has some very exciting elites with close to world record times. The course is very flat, making for good times all around. The marathon expo was a little smaller than other big marathons, but unexpectedly, I found some really good deals. This was my fifth marathon and one I enjoyed tremendously. From a North American perspective, this race had a very international feel to it, with runners I met from GB, Finland, the US, South Africa and Canada. Overall, a great race, a great day, and my second best marathon time. I would love to run this one again if I had the chance.
4.0

By: Joanna H.

Posted: October 20, 2008

Dull course, not enough water, and poor info

This course is flat in every sense of the word. Not much atmosphere compared to the other marathons I have run. And the course. Soooooo dull. There's a 10-15K stretch along a canal where you wind back and forth watching other runners... which is its own sort of torture. There are not enough drink stations and the instructions for the baggage are sketchy at best: Bring your own bag. Transport on the day of is a complete pickle, so sort out a taxi and be prepared to argue with your hotel if they refuse to get one for you. I did run a PB though.
2.0

By: Glen Hendrix

Posted: November 12, 2007

Well organized, not very scenic.

This was a good marathon but having the half marathoners finish when some of us older, slower runners were trying to finish was chaos. The finish arena was very crowded.
3.0

By: Simon C.

Posted: October 29, 2007

Great Course for a PB

The marathon course avoids the center of Amsterdam and a large chunk of the course is concentrated alongside the Amstel river. It's very fast & flat and the conditions in 2007 for a PB were excellent. Not too many crowds along the course except around the Olympic Stadium & Museumplein. Amsterdam is a great city to visit and I would recommend this marathon if you are looking for a well-organized marathon with a fast time.
3.0

By: Sophie H.

Posted: October 25, 2007

Good flat course and weather was ideal for PB

I got back from Amsterdam earlier this week after running the marathon on Sunday. This was only my second marathon (first was Paris in April 2007) and I have to say that the weather conditions on Sunday (12 degrees, overcast, little wind) and a flat course allowed me to knock 25 minutes off my Paris time, so I was very pleased. The expo was well organized and easy to find. I only found out on the morning of the marathon that there were no trams running (and as we were staying south of the city center there was no metro to catch). Had to walk 1.5 miles to the start but did get there 1.5 hours early and was delighted to find plenty of toilets and no queues (great after having to queue for 1.25 hours to go once at Paris!). The start in the stadium was a wonderful experience although I was a little puzzled by being carefully shepherded into the pen for my predicted finishing time, and then the barriers between the pens were removed anyway prior to the start so wasn't quite sure of the point of that. The route itself is not scenic considering what the center of Amsterdam has to offer, but I enjoyed the long stretch along the Amstel and I think for me it did not matter that miles 18-24 were not very attractive ones as I had reached the point of completely tuning out and trying to focus on keeping moving. The drinks stations every 5 km were frequent enough although the cups made things interesting (it was like running the egg and spoon race). There was banana on route. Not many spectators but the ones that were on route were very supportive. The Vondelpark was my favorite part of the route - lovely autumn colors. There was no family/friends meeting area so I was glad I had made arrangements to meet my husband prior to the race, as it would have been a bit of a nightmare otherwise. Didn't stick around for too long afterwards as had to walk 1.5 miles back to the hotel. I thought the online certificate, race results, and photos and video clips were great although not sure about the visual representation of where you finished in relation to other runners (bit deflating if you do it 4 hours plus). Enjoyed three days of sightseeing in Amsterdam. Loved the city and found people very friendly. Hope to return, even if not for the marathon again.
4.0

By: Scott m.

Posted: October 25, 2007

Superb Marathon

This marathon seems to get some mixed reviews. I do not understand why - in my opinion it is close to perfect. I have run it 4 times - and achieved 4 PBs. The course is extremely flat (check out the elevation map on marathonguide.com) and the weather in the last 4 years has been excellent for running. Organization is also first class, with excellent chip collection, plenty of food and drink en route and also lots of extras, like free downloadable photos, a quality running shirt, DVD clips, instant availability of results and photos. The marathon has around 7,000 finishers which means it feels reasonably big, yet you have guaranteed race entry and get space to run at the right pace within only a couple of minutes. You also get the fantastic feeling of finishing inside the Olympic Stadium and then sampling the Amsterdam nightlife to celebrate. Sore knee right now from latest PB, but I will be back in Amsterdam again !
4.0

By: Helen R.

Posted: January 05, 2007

Fine, if you happen to be in the area

Course could have been SO much more interesting! I understand the city powers don't want to cripple the entire city, but seeing the park once is enough and the out-and-back along the Amstel was a few miles too long. Good to see the windmills and polders, but it went on for a LONG time! Would liked to have seen more of the sights! Spectators were very friendly.
3.0

By: Andy W.

Posted: November 08, 2006

Not that exciting

Flat course, but so dull!! Not many sights and a few grotty industrial areas. You run parallel to cars at times, so it's not totally traffic-free. A bit pricey for what you get; pasta party was good though. Thin on ground for spectators until finish in the old Olympic stadium, which isn`t that iconic. Bag deposit was an absolute nightmare and they had cups (not bottles) for water. Even the city I found dirty and not terribly exciting (though a canal boat trip is really nice).
3.0

By: Megan S.

Posted: October 29, 2006

Great race

This was my first marathon, and I had a great time. The course is terrific - flat, as advertised, and a nice mix of city and countryside, including a long stretch along the Amstel River - and I agree that starting and especially ending in Olympic Stadium is pretty amazing. I do not understand the complaints about water stations. They had them just about every 5K (which in my mind is perfectly sufficient), and all were clearly marked on the course map available online and at the expo so runners could plan accordingly. (And I am certain there was a water station at 35K.) The crowds, while not enormous, were enthusiastic, including lots of kids and, further out of town, people who were just hanging out in front of their homes to cheer racers on. While my experience overall was definitely positive, I do have a few small complaints: - Trying to figure out how to get to the start on race day was difficult. Many tram lines were not running on marathon day, which was announced on signs in tram stations - in Dutch only. No one at the marathon expo could answer our questions about what public transit options would be running to bring us to the start, and it took us forever (and a trip to the transit board info center) to actually confirm what lines would be in service. - The t-shirt was sort of awful. It was rather unattractive, and also only available in men's sizes, which is especially a drag when it's a nice breathable athletic shirt, great for training if only it fit better. I'm not petite, but I am a woman in marathon shape, and rather than treasuring my shirt, I don't even want to wear it largely because a men's small is so big on me. - Chip return was a drag. You had to lace the chip into your shoe, then stop afterwards to unlace it. I'm used to New York Road Runners and their plastic zip ties, which can just be quickly snipped after the race. - More food and more variety of food available post-race would have been great - all they really had was fruit. All this aside, it's a great race and I would recommend it, especially if you're prepared for the above.
4.0

By: Keith Ryan

Posted: October 29, 2006

Does it really deserve its reputation?

This is a decent marathon, no doubt. But it's not cheap and I feel that a lot of the money went into non-race frills, such as a wicking race t-shirt, online video clips and stats, a ridiculously fancy course map and a website translated into five languages. I would have preferred more drinks stations, post-race massages, free nibbles, and shuttle buses to/from the stadium. As an example, I did the Brussels Marathon (also an ING event) and it was half the price. You got double the amount of drinks stations, a protein bar at the end, a cap in case of warm weather and a disposable waterproof to wear before the race began. But none of the fancy Amsterdam extras that don't really help you during the race. The course is very dull for such a vibrant city, which really surprised me. The out-and-back along the river was particularly soul-destroying. I set a personal best by 14 minutes on this course but I felt quite let down by the race overall. I will say that the medal is really nice though.
3.0

By: Tomi K.

Posted: October 27, 2006

Enjoyed Amsterdam

Amsterdam was my first international marathon and I enjoyed it very much. Course as well as the climate suited me well and I finished with a new PB. It is true that the course did not pass through the most interesting city areas, but there is always time before and after the race. Start and finish at the Olympic Stadium were memorable. Personal race pictures and video clips on the internet are also very nice. Picking up the number and info package before the race was well organized. Post-race procedures are something to improve for the organization. Of course the city itself was very nice to visit.
4.0

By: Edward L.

Posted: October 21, 2006

Come Prepared

If your used to marathons in the USA, forget about all the great support we get. Bring a water bottle, lube, food, GU etc. Bring warm clothes to dump at the start and to change into at the finish. No blankets are provided. The only buzz kill of the marathon were the half marathoners. At about mile 20, out of nowhere, a pack of juiced-up runners were on my heels, bumping like they were going to win their race. After 20 miles you really don't feel like dealing with these guys. The finish area was packed with half marathoners and there was not much in the way of post-race refreshments. Course missed all the cool areas of Amsterdam. Come to see the town, party like it's 1999 and have a nice training run.
4.0

By: John L.

Posted: October 21, 2006

Disappointed by atmosphere

I enjoyed this marathon. The course was excellent, and the finish in the Olympic Stadium was great. The negatives for me were: 1. The number of spectators was far smaller than I thought it would be, and many had left by the time we arrived back at the stadium. (I took 4 hours - not a week!!) 2. I think you should only get a t-shirt after finishing - and not the day before. 3. The baggage storage in the Sporthallen zuid was a disaster. Everybody seemed to be sticking one of their race numbers on the bag, then were told to take it off when they reached the top of the queue, and then were told put it on there back, so they could be given another sticker for the bag, and nobody obeyed any of the queues, which resulted in quick tempers and mayhem. I bet there had to be people late for the start because of the bad organization here. 4. Also I found the atmosphere among the runners to be poor. I did Dublin last year and found the runners friendlier and the spectators more enthausiastic. I would recommend this marathon but I preferred Dublin by a long way.
3.0

By: PAUL P.

Posted: October 20, 2006

Great place for a PB

Must have been too cold and windy to come out and watch. Felt like a training run. Mostly serious runners - a small field, circa 6,000. Plenty of room to run a PB, and a nice, flat course.
4.0

By: selim f.

Posted: October 20, 2006

excellent race

Very flat and beautiful course (even flatter than Chicago) with a good crowd. The race is very fast (appropriate for a PB), however quite crowded. Be careful to be at the appropriate pace location at the starting point since slow runners could easily slow you down throughout the race if you don't pay attention to this. Excellent support, and no complaints regarding water stops since anything more would cause over-hydration. The city is beautiful, friendly, and definitely worthwhile to see. A quiet hotel around Vondelpark would be a good choice.
5.0

By: paul g.

Posted: October 20, 2006

great marathon

There was a great buzz around the finish in the Olympic Stadium. The spectators were out in thousands.
5.0

By: Tim S.

Posted: October 18, 2006

Overall, a great marathon

This was my first international marathon and it did not disappoint. The course is flat (was able to post my second best time), the organization wonderful, and the city a great host. It was quite inspiring to start and end in the Olympic Stadium. The sight of three different windmills definitely made you know you were running in Holland. :) My only concern regards water and food. Having Gatorade at each water stop was great... but there were WAY too few stops. The availability of food at the end was rather disappointing. Definitely the smallest amount offered of the four different marathons I have run. Bagels, yogurt... anything added to the choice of bananas and oranges would have been great. Overall, though, it was a wonderful international experience! I would highly recommend it.
5.0

By: Eugene B.

Posted: September 15, 2006

nice, but definitely not enough water

Lovely everything, including the weather, but definitely not enough water stops. Nothing between 30K and 41K!
4.0

By: Albert W.

Posted: April 19, 2006

flat and fast city marathon

The fastest course I've run so far. I went to Amsterdam to break 3 hours for the first time of my life and I finished in 2:57:58!! Big PR. A lot of fast runners, so you never run on your own, and there is always someone to focus on. The wind was a bit strong this year, but it didn't bother me so much. Temperature(58F) was perfect. Water stops were o.k. and enough for me. The only negative point was the "hidden" KM-markers. I missed a lot of them because spectators stood in front of them and blocked my view. After-race food is sparse (only a half banana and a sandwich), but the race costs not more than 45 euros, so you can spend some money on your own food. Two very nice surprises are the showers and even a free massage. Course was fantastic; never got bored.
4.0

By: Scott M.

Posted: January 08, 2006

Fantastic Marathon

This marathon is fantastically organized and has the added benefit of an extremely flat course. I have run it twice, both times ending up with big PBs. As for the comments from other posters regarding refreshments "only every 5K" - I don't know what you are used to, but from my experience this is normal (in the UK and Europe) and is also ample. Just make sure you stop at each one. Whilst there are many other autumn marathons, a major feature of this one is that there are several support races, which means that large groups can travel together, have a great weekend, and run whatever suits them from 10K, to half, to full marathon. Our group (of approximately 15) may well return again to Amsterdam in 2006.
5.0

By: Jose A.

Posted: October 29, 2005

Beautiful country; bring your own water.

The pre-race expo was good, the people of the Netherlands wonderful, and the course beautiful. Arrival at race start was delayed because of race street closures. Because of closures, only one tram line was running to the start; unfortunately for many of us at our tram stop, we didn't know about the race-day tram schedule till the last hour and half before the event. Secret: tram #16 does run on race-day. Luckily I had planned on arriving 1 and 1/2 hours before start; with the delays, we got to the stadium 15-20 minutes before the start. First five miles are quite tight with more than a few bottlenecks. So, try to get in your expected finishing time slot at the start or you will expend much energy getting to the open course. But the course; it is beautiful.... The canals, the people, the bikes, the green, the windmill, terrific course.... Water and aid was problematic: water every 5K leaves no room for error over 26.2 miles. Next time I will carry a bottle. All in all, a great race in terrific city. Thank you, Amsterdam, for a great destination event.
4.0

By: Prasad K.

Posted: October 21, 2005

Good marathon to run

Positives: Flat course; good organization; good crowd support (although it may not be proportional to a 20,000-runner event); free massages before and after the run! Negatives: More water stations would help (they had one every 5 KM); poor directions to the venue; bag storage; after the race, Gatorade, etc.
4.0

By: James C.

Posted: October 19, 2005

Enjoyable marathon

This was my first marathon outside the US and was very impressed by how well organized the event was, how well supported the aid stations were (although not as many as some in the US, at least the Gatorade was not watered down!), beautiful course, etc. And the city itself - WOW! All the walking around the days leading up to the race all but killed my legs but it was well worth it.
4.0

By: Jimmy S.

Posted: October 19, 2005

Great experience

Excellent organization: everything went really smoothly. Picking up your number, handing in and retrieving your sports bag, finding a shower afterwards.... no problems at all and hardly any queues. The course was a bit disappointing to me, since it doesn't really take you through any interesting parts of Amsterdam, but it is nice and flat. Good for running, not for sight-seeing. The first 10 km were also difficult from time to time because you would turn from a very broad street into a park or (a lot) narrower street, but it never became a real problem where you would come to a stand-still. Beware though that the October weather in Holland can be quite cold and wet. We had a lot of luck with this year's sunny weather and hardly any wind at all. A strong headwind would have been murderous when running along the Amstel River. Even though it's flat, don't underestimate the course. But the best of all: The spectators were absolutely marvelous. Lots of people applauding and cheering, bands playing at several parts of the course. I had a really hard time at 34 km, and one of the spectators actually jumped over the fence to cheer me on and run with me for a couple of hunderd meters. Great stuff. This guy really helped me through my worst moment. I would recommend this marathon to anyone.
4.0

By: Tom S.

Posted: October 17, 2005

Definite improvement on last year

This was a definite improvement on last year; several loops - including one around a rather dreary industrial plant - have been removed (it was around the 30k point last year), leading to a faster and straighter course with bags of atmosphere. Bad points: A couple of cars (!) in with the runners on the course, and I do feel it would have eased congestion around the drink stops to have bottled water, as opposed to cups. Definitely worth doing, but worth having something to carry water in if it's a hot day.
4.0

By: Jean MASSELIN

Posted: October 17, 2005

very nice

Very fast because of the flat country. Although, not many spectators (except in the center). Nice weather. Outstanding organization. Very nice views along the Amstel River. Excellent overall conditions for runners aiming at a nice performance.
4.0

By: Michael Madder

Posted: July 07, 2005

World-Class

This is hardly hot news as I ran this in '97, '99 and 2003. It gets better every time. The "new" sponsors have raised the profile significantly and yet it remains a relatively small event. Some of the top internationals compete here... but it is also an event for the rest of us. I have always found the service, registration, and organization excellent. How many city marathons will enter you the day before, and give out numbers on the day of the race? I can't believe some of the negative comments. I don't expect to find a buffet on the course, and as for canals with bridges and streets with block paving, the city is great and the marathon is one of my favorites.... Not a stroll in the park, but Vondel is quite special. I think I've just decided which October marathon to run this year.
4.0

By: John O.

Posted: January 04, 2005

Great race, a lot of fun

Well organized and a nice course. Yes, the bridges after 22-23 miles hurt, but you have to pay for all that flat sometime. Weather was ok, drum bands and dancers along the route were great. I have a few more marathons in mind but might do this again.
5.0

By: Mark Dabbs

Posted: December 27, 2004

Amsterdam, who says its flat?

Should be one of the flattest marathons ever, but looks can be deceptive, especially around the twenty-three mile mark. Believe me, there are inclines along the route, which is sporadic in its crowd support. However, if you want to run each capital city in Europe, it remains to be done!
3.0

By: Mark B.

Posted: November 13, 2004

Desperately seeking cobblestones.

I agree with 99% of the previous posts (excellent course, fun atmosphere, super experience to start & finish in the Olympic stadium, etc.) Here's my 1% difference: (1) I saw no cobblestones. Not a single one. There *were* brick sections, though. A well-laid brick street (and these were all laid with Dutch precision!) is certainly not cobblestone. The experience is much more akin to concrete than cobblestone. It's certainly not a track surface, but doesn't hurt the ankles & joints like cobblestone always does. (2) The half-marathoners and 10k runners had the 'treat' of running through the marathon pack. A bit unpleasant for them, I think, as I saw more than one 'swim move' by a sprinting half marathoner trying to get around a tired marathoner on a crowded street. (3) Top-notch expo. Number pick-up on race day is always much appreciated! The whole expo, including vendors, etc., was going strong an hour before the start. A great marathon. Not to be missed!
5.0

By: Julio Arce

Posted: October 26, 2004

great fast course!

Amsterdam is the perfect place to run a pr, however the organizers could even improve the course a bit by avoiding some of the coblestone streets. In general the course is pretty flat and fast not to mention great weather. The organization is good, but the organizers could improve a bit the water stations and make them one every 3k instead of one every 5k, especially at the last 12 km when you really need some fluids. Other than that the organization and fans were great.
4.0

By: IAIN T.

Posted: October 23, 2004

Quality event which is excellent for fast times

This was my first marathon outside London and overall I thoroughly enjoyed the event. The Olympic stadium provides a good starting point and after 7K you re-enter the stadium before heading out into the country and along the banks of the River Amstel at about 13 - 22K. Crowd support was poor compared to London but those who were out watching gave plenty encouragement. The drinks stations were every 5K and I feel that bottles would have been a better option rather than cups of water which spill very easily. Between 25 - 29K the course runs through industrial areas which are rather bleak but the last few Km's are good. I would certainly intend returning in 2005 as firstly I ran a personal best time, secondly Amsterdam is so accessible and thirdly the event is well organized. There was an excellent pasta party the night before and I enjoyed running a marathon which only had about 5,000 runners in it compared to the 30,000-plus at London. A few friends ran the supporting 10K and half marathon, which although good events, saw the leading runners become congested with the slower marathon runners which impeded their runs. I think the organizers will have to look at the various starting times to avoid this happening again next year.
4.0

By: Andrew M.

Posted: October 22, 2004

Half Marathon

Really enjoyed the half marathon. First time running in the 'Dam; very well organized, crowds were good, and the course was fast - we locked in a PB despite giving in to many of the city's temptations the previous night!
4.0

By: Clare W.

Posted: October 21, 2004

Good, but could improve for half

Mixed feelings on this race, where I ran the half. The pros: - Good organization at start, where packet pickup is available up to half an hour before the start - excellent. - Nice finish in the Olympic stadium. - Flat and fast course. - Great city - the course doesn't make full use of it, but not too bad. The cons: - Understaffed water stations at only 5k marks. - Half marathoners are VERY much second-class citizens in this race: NO prizes, NO KM markers, which led to confusion as you came across a few marathon ones. - Didn't see any toilets around the course... there must have been some, but I didn't see any. - Medals the same for Marathon, half, and 10k. Amsterdam is a great city, and the marathon here is rightly getting bigger and bigger. It's just a shame that they don't put the same effort into making the other distance racers (which by far outnumber the marathoners!) feel more 'worthy'.
3.0

By: Scott M.

Posted: October 19, 2004

Very Enjoyable Marathon

This was my second marathon and I selected it because it sounded like a fast one in a great city. I was delighted with my choice (and recorded 3:23, an improvement of 23 minutes on my first marathon in Rome). The good and bad bits (in my opinion) were as follows: GOOD Start and finish in Olympic Stadium (also an extra lap of the stadium after 7k) Easy registration Clear km and 5km markers Plenty of Gatorade (every 5k) Music and drummers - every 5k or so - added enormously to the feel-good factor Course was nice and flat Phenomenally quick posting of results and also photos (within one day) BAD Its a pity that we couldn't see more of the center of Amsterdam during the run (although the small bit we did see was the hardest part of the course due to a few cobbles and some bridges over canals)
4.0

By: Chris D.

Posted: October 19, 2004

The friendly Dutch do a great job.

This marathon was a fantastic experience. From the fast responses to emails sent prior to the event and the easy registration process the day before to the finish in the Olympic stadium, everything went smoothly and was carried out in a truly professional manner. The marathon start and finish in the stadium make this a great marathon for people like me (sub-5 hours) who are unlikely to get this kind of attention in the sporting arena. The first part of the race is through the city center streets with lots of noisy local supporters, bands and dancers lining the streets. The race continues through the park before a lap through the stadium and out along and back a major river. During this part there is less support but it is still there with the Dutch people opening up their houses and blasting out music. Back into the city there are a lonely few K through an industrial/commercial district, but that just adds to the lift you get when you enter the city again - the support is tremendous, vocal and loud. The refreshment stops each 5k are well run and the volunteers are enthusiastic to the end. Finishing through the park again and into the stadium for the finish is not to be forgotton. Great city, too, with lots to see/do for the runner and supporters, plus you get the effervescent and friendly Dutch people. Recommended.
4.0

By: Justine P.

Posted: October 19, 2004

Just ok

About the first half of the race goes through the countryside outside of Amsterdam. It is nice and quaint but there are no spectators. The next 8km go through an ugly industrial park. It is only in the last 10km of the race that you are actually running in beautiful Amsterdam. The start and finish are inside the Olympic stadium and there are lots of spectators in the stands. My biggest complaint was that at the end runners got a bottle of Gatorade and a few pieces of banana, but there was no other food.
4.0

By: Harald H.

Posted: October 18, 2004

Amsterdam Moving Up

A flat and fast course suitable for a PR, and since the sponsors started to promote the event to the general public, with a better crowd. Samba bands along the course and entertainment in the Olympic Stadium helped to set a positive atmosphere.
4.0

By: martine h.

Posted: September 08, 2004

Fast but boring

A nice run to set a PR. It is not crowded and you have enough space to run fast. Not many spectators; the organizers try every year to get the Amsterdam people to support it, but it still doesn't work. The last 6 km or so is bad. You go into the center with a lot of small hills for cars. It kills your legs on the end. Nevertheless, I set a PR and the organization is good.
3.0

By: Ken Chapman

Posted: August 18, 2004

NO prizes for HALF marathon.

I had a personal best at 60 years of age in the half marathon and did 1 hour, 30 minutes, 20 seconds to finish 187th out of 3,494 runners. I was told that as the marathon was the main race, there were no prizes at all for the half. Surely with all the entry fees from the 3,494 runners, a series of prizes should have been awarded. I have raced all over the world and always had a prize in these circumstances. A poor effort and a disgrace to all shorter distance than marathon runners. As a club outing it would be ideal, but not until this ruling is changed.
2.0

By: Darren DeKeyser

Posted: May 25, 2004

Lucky to have run it twice -- more to come

While on assignment in The Netherlands and Germany, I was able to run this race in 2001 and 2003. I established a personal best in both races. The course is real fast; however, it does change year after year depending on the construction in the city. Essentially they just change which street you run down around km 32-38 due to inner city construction. Depending upon which route you get, there may be more cobblestones and small ups and downs over canals, but still something which anyone should be able to overcome. I suggest running in the middle of the tram tracks whenever possible (clean, flat and no crowning effect -- these are prefab pieces of pavement). The organization is very good. The entry and pickup is open practically until the start. The organizers were very accommodating and language is not a problem. The crowd on the course could be more excitable; however the course is well lined and well supported. I have run in other international marathons and competed in races in sizes from 90 to 35,000. I have seen the millions lining the streets in Chicago and few hundreds in small towns in Sweden. Each have there own unique characteristics. The rather small field in Amsterdam allows you to establish your own pace by the first kilometer. I will definitely run this race again. The only other European race which I have interest in is London.
4.0

By: Barbara G.

Posted: November 05, 2003

Great First Half Marathon Experience

This was my first half marathon - and first race of any distance beyond 5K and I had a BLAST! Registration was easy and any questions I had were quickly answered. It took a bit to find the expo, but once I ran into a volunteer for the race I got directions. Was easy to pick up my number and t-shirt, pasta party was ok... nothing exciting. The weather was perfect... cool and only a slight wind. In Italy I had been running in much warmer temps so the change was very pleasant. I thought the fan support was great...but I am used to running alone, so I can't compare it to any other race yet. Course was great... mostly flat except for slight inclines at bridges. Overall a great race for me and one I would recommend.
4.0

By: Joseph v.

Posted: November 04, 2003

The best marathon with great spectators support

The Amsterdam Marathon offers a lot to visiting marathoners. A great city to visit with a fast, flat, scenic course with excellent chance of obtaining a PB! The course runs through a historical European city, down along the Amstel River and canals. The route is lined with a cheering spectator support, loud bands, and the best finish line. The marathoner feels like an Olympian running into the Olympic Stadium to the roar of the crowd and pump up music. The weather was ideal, cool (~10c), dry, and sunny with little wind (except for a crosswind along the Amstel River). The Dutch people are friendly and conversant in the English language. The city has plenty of diverse activities for all interests. Starting in an Olympic Stadium the friends, and families in the arena - what a send off. The course starts with a loop of the last 3 km of the marathon route through the famous Vondelpark. The course is well marked with a balloon arch and time at every five kilometres. Aid station every 4 to 5 km. Plenty of people cheering you along the route. People are willing to root for different countries. To finish a marathon running is the goal, but to finish like an Olympian is a feeling to behold (ie, awesome!!!).
5.0

By: Yves T.

Posted: October 20, 2003

Very enjoyable marathon

From some of the previous comments, I had some mixed feelings. Was it difficult to get there? Was it well organized? As soon as I got my registration package by the mail, most of my concerns disappear. A very detailed map provided clear direction and all the information I needed. Pick up of the race number was quick and easy. The race itself was a pleasure. A bit more than 3,000 runners make it very easy to pass (or get passed). The course is very diversified: parks, countryside and the historic canals! The part I prefer was the double loop circuit (7 km and then 35 km). Being concerned with a potential injury, I could run the first 7 km, see how I felt, and from that point, I could decide to carry on.
4.0

By: David Grace

Posted: January 28, 2003

Overall a wonderful experience.

I have run marathons all over the world and this is the first time I have taken time out comment on a race. The coach from California prompted me to do so, because his words may mislead you. The race expo and packet pick-up were actually quite organized. It took me a total of 10 minutes to pick up my number and chip. Absolutely no problems. No signs were posted telling me where to go, but it wasn't difficult following the other runners. Making it to the starting line wasn't difficult either. I walked to the stadium from my hotel in less than 20 minutes and had more than enough time to warm up. However, one must be organized, study the area beforehand and stay in the right section of the city. The course was absolutely breathtaking and I don't remember too many cobblestones (maybe 10). From running along the Amstel canal to running through the city and the Vondelpark, I was constantly aware of my surroundings. The crowds could have been a little better. But running through the streets of Amsterdam were good enough. Congratulations to the event organizers and the city of Amsterdam. A truly wonderful event.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 04, 2002

A Great First Timer Marathon

As an American, alot of people thought this to be an odd choice for a first time marathon, however the reasons are obvious. First the flatness of the course followed by the time of year with ideal temperatures. Add to this Dutch efficiency and a great race is had by all. The start and finish at the Olympic Stadium was the highlight of my running this year.Hope to be back next year, although I'm considering the Akron Towpath Marathon for next October. (rumored to be a beautiful course)
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: November 09, 2002

Get there early!

Amsterdam is one of those cities everyone wants to visit. The people are open and friendly, there is no hint of any menace in the streets, there's culture a plenty, and subculture too - an intelectual type of place. The excuse is the course, a flat, fast, 26.2 mile beast tempting you with that elusive PB. The weather was perfect, cool and still. Starting in an Olympic Stadium the friends, and families in the arena -what a send off. For an old jogger like me the course was excellent, not clogged like some big city marathons where they seem to work out how many runners they can pack onto the course, double it and make you wait ten minutes to cross the line. This was neat, enough runners - low thousands I guess - but enough space too. Drinks every 3 miles or so, clappping, and cheers every minute, and flat, fast course all the way - who could ask for more? The Vondelpark was a good place to spectate, as you pass through it twice offering your supporters the chance for a before, and after photo shoot. Finishing in the stadium was awesome, you enter through an uninspiring concrete rectangular gap, then suddenly there is the last 200m of tartan track. Behind you emerges a wall of sound - a stand of supporters. The arena is a great place for supporters - unlike some big city marathons where there is simply nowhere. The photographer encourages you to show the arms raised gesture of conquest-It's over. At the end I hobbled off strangely satisfied that I'll have to come back to get that PB. The downside ? The organisation of the start - It took me 2 hours to get from Amsterdam Central Station (the Metro was totally unsigned and a nightmare) to the start line. Fortunately some kind people let me push in to leave my baggage or I would have missed the start.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 30, 2002

Great event with typical Dutch attitude

I Have now run this event twice. The latest course is super, starts and ends in the 1928 Olympic stadium and follows (as far as possible) the route of that year's Olympic course. Some urban parts, some scenic (including a chance to see the lead pack 5 to 8 km ahead across the Amstel canal), but always flat. Support is sporadic but still encouraging. Organisation is laid back, but still effective and effcient. Don't know what the last reviewer did or expected but, for me, the Sportshalle was simple to find (the map couldn't be clearer) and the water and AA drink was more than adequate. What else do you need? Perhaps some people have been spoiled by too many huge, commericial events (you won't find candy and fruit along the way, in fact I bet the 1928 runners had nothing at all!)
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 24, 2002

Completed Marathon 20 Oct 2002

I have to aggree with the comments made by the previous runners. Not much changed. The course was flat, fast, and very nice. Truly enjoyed running through the city and the Amstel canal. On the downside, organization and support was most frustrating. Just finding the location of the Sporthalle took me over 2 hours. I could not find a single sign or poster indicating that there is a marathon run that weekend in Amsterdam. Another point, bring your own food ;other then water and AA drinks, there was no other nourishment available. I loved the city and would do the run again, but I urge potential runners to read the above comments as they are accurate.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 23, 2002

WORST of the BIG CITY marathons?

Having been to Amsterdam once before, I was excited to see how the city handled an event like the marathon. I've seen and run marathons in San Diego, LA, Chicago, and Kona, among others, and think Amsterdam is up there among the best of the WORLD CLASS cities. I couldn't have been MORE disappointed. I am a marathon training coach, and I also had 10 runners with me to run the marathon and half-marathon, and was horrified at how disorganized everything was. One person made the arrangements for our whole group. One contact, one credit card, simple, right? They didn't have 1 of our runners in their system, and then another they lost her race number. Out of the 10, only 3 were paid for, and only 4 had addresses resembling our actual contact information. Then there's the race itself. Cobblestone, about the ONLY surface worse than concrete, for MILES. The worst part was how they handled the slower runners in my group. The start and finish line for the race was inside the Olympic Stadium, completely away from trains, traffic, etc., but they closed the finish line at exactly 6 hours anyway, and refused medals to anyone after that. They published what times they would close down parts of the course (i.e. open them up to traffic), and 15-20 minutes before that, they blockaded those parts, and told runners the race was over and they had to get on a bus to go back to the start. My runners were on pace for 5hr, 40min, refused to get on the bus, and pushed past the blockade to make it to the finish in time, thank God. I registered for the race, and as a coach, tried to make it to the finish line for one of my runners only to have an organizer hold me back and say 'runners only', at which time I showed him my race number and he still wouldn't let me pass. This race was in it's 27th running. I expect this kind of stuff from SMALL CITY events in their 1st year. Totally unacceptable from a world class city in it's 27th year. I highly recommend visiting Amsterdam, but NOT for their marathon, you will be extremely disappointed, unless you have a high tolerance for BS.
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: November 12, 2001

Amsterdam - PB

Amsterdam was my first marathon and therefore a personal best! I managed to keep a very steady pace through the race due to the flatness of the course and the limited number of runners. The volunteers at the finish in the Olympic Stadium were very friendly. I highly recommend this marathon for beginners.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 22, 2001

A very fast course.

This was a fast and flat marathon, as advertised. The course was set up with aid stations every 5 kilometers but after 15 they started to either come every 4 (so you thought you were farther) or every 6 or 7 (so you were dying of thirst). The crowds at the end were great but with a 10k starting on our last 10, it was a bit confusing and depressing being passed by all of the fresh starters. The crowds lined the last 5 kilometers giving a lot of much needed support and cheers. Finishing in the Olympic stadium was fantastic, hearing your name called and the crowds cheering was just awesome. A downside to the marathon was the lack of bananas or oranges along the way. They were there at the end but we were allowed only 1 quarter of an orange and 1 half a banana so that the half-marathoners would have some as well. I think I would have gladly paid extra for a whole banana! But ah well, I finished and it was great.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 22, 2001

Ran the race yesterday....good race.

This is an excellent marathon for the first timer or for the 3:30 - 4:30 marathoner. The course is very nice, with a long stretch through the countryside. Dutch fans are very supportive of runners, but there were far less than Rotterdam. Overall, a fine race, I highly recommend it. You will not get lost in the crowd because there are only 2,000 runners. The start and finish are on the track in the old Olympic Stadium of 1928. Enjoy!
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 27, 2000

A Dutch treat.

The Marathon course is a double loop, flat, fast, and uncrowded. The race itself is very well organized. Packet pick up and expo were just the opposite. VERY disorganized. But the Dutch are so nice, who cares? Accomodations, food, museums, and other extracurriculars are all great. It's really hard to beat Amsterdam for a fall getaway. I'm considering 2000. But what is Delta Lloyd - no one could tell me. Nor what the XXX stands for in the coat of arms (not the obvious).
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 07, 2000

Fast, Flat and Fun...

Ran it on October 18, 1999. My first time to Europe so I decided to combine a marathon with my vacation. Amsterdam Marathon was FLAT and FAST!! Two loops around the main city, crossing numerous channels. The weather was great (50's) and good support throughout the race. A great way to see the city. Carry a small camera for great photo opportunities. Small race of ~1500 runners of which only about 150 were women. I found the pre-race a bit disorganized and the Expo lacking. Post race was uneventful with only a table of sliced fruit and water/AA drink. Over all, I enjoyed the marathon and Amsterdam very much!!
5.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide