Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Rock 'n' Roll Montreal Marathon
Back

Rock 'n' Roll Montreal Marathon - Race Reviews

3.5
Average rating based on 73 Reviews

By: Yves M.

Posted: October 10, 2019

Disappointing....

I'd like to say that the organizer are improving this event but unfortunately not. They corrected last year flaws (no finisher beer, no free bus/metro ticket) but introduced more serious 'bugs': - 50 minute start delay - PA system muted for 5-10 minutes after the elite started - Elite runners had to dodge slower half-marathon runners - boring marathon course (half marathon was ok) - First Aid slow response time - Sub par live entertainment - Frugal post-run snack For all of this, I think I paid too much for what I got in return. Being owned by both Rock'n Roll and Ironman, the whole organization must be a real mess.. Too many cooks spoil the broth. That was my 4th participation to it but it's over - I'm not coming back next year.
3.0

By: Bruce G.

Posted: September 24, 2019

Not worth the effort

There are a few good things about this race. The run through Air Force station and later into the arena with cheerleaders, and the people at the water stations all positive. However the rest very poor. You can't call it a Rock and Roll race with no bands. A few individuals play guitar and or music out of computer? Really? Aids stations with tab water that had such a high chlorine level difficult to drink and Gatorade. One station had half a banana. Started an hour late, great just standing around not knowing what is going on. After 8 Rock and Roll races and 7 Marathons this is by far the worst. Many out there better than this one.
3.0

By: Wayne Wright

Posted: November 26, 2016

Not Your Usual Rock n Roll

INTRODUCTION: I am a race-walker with a median marathon completion time of 5:17:35. The Marathon Rock n Roll de Montreal was my forty-first 26.2-miler accomplished. COURSE: It was a great day for a marathon: temperature on Pont Jacques-Cartier start was 44 degrees (7 Celsius) with a northerly head wind that certainly provided a wind chill factor equivalent to a temperature in the high-thirties. The course can easily be divided into four parts of similar length, starting with the descent from our bridge that crossed over the Saint Lawrence River onto Ile Sainte-Helene. After descending to the shoreline just after the first kilometer, we were in flat territory for six-plus miles. Our tour around the outer edge of the island included going through La Ronde theme park before crossing over Chena Le Moyne onto Ile Notre-Dame, where our path took us on a Formula 1 race course, perhaps the smoothest and flattest part of a marathon route this side of Berlin. We began our second course segment a little over 10 kilometers into the race, we headed north toward Centre-ville (Downtown), crossing over the Saint Lawrence River on Pont de la Concorde and staying close to the piers as we entered Vieux (Old) Montreal, including traversing the most photographed street in town, Place Jacques-Cartier. After passing by Hotel de Ville (City Hall) on Rue Notre-Dame, with a clear view of the gigantic Molson brewery, we soon turned north, uphill into Ville Marie and later toward Parc La Fontaine, where we would separate from the half marathoners, who outnumbered us by almost four-to-one, just before mile 13. The third part of the course comprised of two out-and-backs, one initially going west on Boulevard Saint-Joseph toward Mont-Royal and one initially going north on commercial Avenue Christophe-Coulomb and returning mostly on residential Rue de la Roche. The roads were of rolling terrain and were mostly straight, thus allowing us not to worry too much about finding the shortest path. Beginning just past mile 20, the fourth and final leg of the course was characterized by a T-shaped out-and-back, toward the east, mostly on Boulevard Saint-Joseph. At mile 23, we were afforded a brief glimpse of the Olympic Stadium before returning toward the finish line at Parc La Fontaine. Finish time temperature was 61 degrees (16 Celsius). ORGANIZATION: Nicely done, with the usual Rock n Roll efficiency. Well organized expo, but with a little less logoed merchandise than your usual Rock n Roll race. Also, unlike the other Rock n Roll expos, marathon tee shirts were not sold at the Rock n RollBrooks booth just after leaving the bib pickup area, but at a separate booth just before departing the convention hall. One unique aspect of this race was both English and metric oriented participants could run in harmony: signs for each mile (in blue) and kilometer (in red) were posted. SPECTATORS: Typical in number for a marathon of this size, enthusiastic in support. Most of the bands were in the front half of the race. CONCLUSION: This race was more subtle than your typical Rock n Roll event; perhaps one may liken it to an acoustic version of the same amped-up tune. Nevertheless, it was a well done affair and worth considering for those who want to do a race in Francophone Canada. Bravo, Montreal.
4.0

By: Sanjay M.

Posted: September 26, 2016

87th Marathon! Bon Marathon pour tous!

This was my 87th full marathon! The race offered runners free subway passes the day of and that is truly awesome in itself. All marathon finishers received a jacket at the end as well, this in addition to the shirt. My only complaint was the information given during the race expo. I would have preferred receiving a sheet with instructions in both official languages for fans. Parking was very difficult and expensive due to the construction. Not many bands in the second half. Most of course is not shaded and that is why I and may runners had cramps in their lower legs in the last half. The jacket pick up was not intuitive in the finish area and I preferred it be near the finish line.
3.0

By: Go Blazers

Posted: September 26, 2016

Very well organized considering its size

Note: I ran the half, not the full marathon + Pretty impressive that they are able to handle 30,000+ runners all getting to the starting point with public transit. The one day passes were a great idea and although the Berri-UQAM station was packed, we made it no problem. + Each corral had it's own starting 'gun' - much nicer than having only one start + The course (through an island park, amusement park, Formula 1 racetrack, old section of town, and ending in a park) was very, very scenic - After exiting the subway station closest to the starting area we waited for 40 min for 30 or so portapotties until giving up. Then when we walked to the bridge we found there were maybe 100 or so portapotties there with much shorter lines. It would have been nice if we were made aware of this - maybe at the Expo there could be a big map of the starting area. - There were sections of the course that were packed, for example at mile 11 over the Pont de la Concorde and on the road across from Habitat 67. With this many runners that may just be the price to pay. - After the race we had to run to the airport and were delayed by a big construction project on Hwy 20. It would have been helpful for the race organizers to at least warn runners of this kind of construction over race weekend.
5.0

By: chirea b.

Posted: September 21, 2015

Only two watches on 42KM !

One of the nicest Marathon course. But... What was the course time when I cross the start line ? I didn't know. The same when I did cross 10K,20K, half, and so all the way to finish line 42.2K. I'm thinking will be help full for runners and spectators to have displayed the course time on several places not only 5K and 42K
3.0

By: Marc K.

Posted: October 01, 2013

Magnificent Montreal

The Montreal Marathon is a nicely run Rock & Roll Event. There are actually 4 other races at the same time, a half marathon, 10K, 5K, & 1K. The organizers will say over 20,000finishers but only about 3,000 finished the marathon, which is typical for a Rock & Roll event. Course: First half is flat with some great scenery along the 2 smaller islands of Montreal. You start on Jacques Cartier Bridge, run through an amusement park, Biodome, on Grand Prix race track, across another bridge, past Habitat 67, then past some of historic Old Montreal waterfront. This year there was a slight rain at the start causing some major puddles in the flat area in the first 5 miles. The second half had some slight hills (underpasses) but nothing to worry about. It takes you through some nice areas north, and east of the finish area. You actually run by the Olympic Stadium (it would have been better to finish on the stadium like Bruce Jenner (Kardashian) did it 1976. Getting to the start of the race is easy on the Green Metro line but congested do to the amount of runners. Course is littered with bands as usual, some quite interesting, others not. Plenty of water, Gatorade and gels on the course. The start area could have used more toilets. I did not use the baggage, so I cannot comment. There was a slight race waiting on the bride and the first 5 miles. Bring some toss able clothes. Fans: I was quite surprised by the turnout of fan support along the entire course. Way to go Montreal!! Expo and swag: typical but convenient expo, nice runners shirt but no separate shirt for the marathoners. Nice big finishers medal as typical with Rock & Roll with the Biodome as the center piece. Finish: Smooth finish line area with food bags for finishers. A little disappointing though, other Rock & Roll races (DC) had ample food stuffs and chocolate milk. None here, nice post-race festival with free beer for finishers, concert and finishers gear for sale. There were many vendors giving out free samples if you needed more food. Overall this is a nice race to run and a great destination race. The city of Montreal is beautiful to visit in September. Weather overall is cool early fall. I recommend the Botanical Jardin at the Olympic park, it is worth the price of admission
4.0

By: Mike L.

Posted: September 30, 2013

Not bad, but not great...!

This was my 8th consecutive marathon over eight years, second in Canada, but first Rock n' Roll Event. All in all, this event was 'meh'... in my humble opinion. It's an incredible city with friendly people, a decently organized event, but it's another example of a race getting greedy. Here are my specific thoughts: 1) The expo was small and pretty boring, and the volunteers had no energy. The Brooks merchandise was decent but of course pricey. 2) The official race shirt is pretty ugly and short sleeve, which is unacceptable to me. It's an autumn marathon (well, basically) and it's in Montreal! 3) It is evident from the expo on that this event is ALL about the half marathon. I got the overwhelming sense at the start line that I was overcome with half marathon runners, and many first timers amongst them. This was the second race that I've run that had the half end right along side the marathon course and it's an INCREDIBLY disheartening set-up. It messes with your mind! I really think that the course organizers need to reevaluate the course and/or the timing of the events if they want to grow the actual marathon. For this reason alone, I would not run this race again. (Caveat: I have NOTHING against half marathon runners and think it's an incredible running accomplishment!) 4) (These things seem petty but)... Where were the thermal blankets at the end!?! It was cold, windy, damp, and we had been rained on (the first several miles were MISERABLE, but luckily the actual rain stopped)! Also, the medal is decent, but looks kinda cheap. 5) The overall course of the marathon was less scenic than I imagined it would be, but all in all not that bad. The biggest problem was the lack of spectators on the second half (again, because most people were there to cheer for half runners). With all this said, I would rate the event as slightly below average. It's a flat course which allowed me to get a P.R. (the rain and wind might have helped with that) and it was a very fun weekend in a great city. I just think that the event has tried to get to big and that the half marathon overtook the day. And little cutbacks might seem minor but they matter to the runners!
3.0

By: Francois Belisle

Posted: September 26, 2013

Great 1st marathon. Flat course...

This was my very first marathon, and I was kind of worried about everyone saying it was a hard course. I live near Montreal, so I decided it would be wise to choose an event close by for my first full marathon. The timing in the season, and location were just perfect for me. When you read comments about the course, you can see that many runners say it's a hilly course, and most talk about the Berri street hill. If you've ever ran on a course that is not 100% flat or downhill, you will find the course very flat, and easy. That said, I loved everything about the event, but mostly, the thousands of fans who cheer you up, and shout your name (written on your bib). This is a very nice touch, and really makes a huge difference on the mental state. As others mentionned, there were way to few toilets. The waiting time for a toilet 1 hour before the start was about 3 hours... Like most runners, I simply decided not to go, and see what would happen. There aren't very many toilets after the start either. The bands were really good, and over all, I really loved it. I'll be back next year to beat my 3h32m mark.
5.0

By: Marc D.

Posted: September 23, 2013

Great first marathon

This was my first marathon and I it far exceeded my expectation. The course if flat, flat, flat and the first half is very scenic. You start on a bridge, run through an amusement park, across another bridge, on a race track, across another bridge, past Habitat 67, then past some of historic Montreal. The race then splits off at mile 13 when 3/4th of the runners stop at the half marathon. The second half of the course is less scenic and a bit repetitive but the on course Music breaks it up and keeps you entertained. The fans along the course are great and will high-five you and cheer you on, even calling you out by your name which is on your race bib. The course is also great for spectators, my parents saw me at mile 5, 10, 15, 20 and 26! In summary, I think the more popular half-marathon is probably better because of the scenic course, but the full marathon was an amazing experience.
5.0

By: Kelvin Moy

Posted: September 27, 2012

Close to a solid 9 marathon

My first marathon in Canada and my first R&R series marathon. While some reviews has mention R&R is not good, I think it is an above average race. The starting area is OK. One comment is not enough toilet area in the starting area. It gets a bit crowded at the start line on the bridge as a lot of spectators blocking some of the road. Corral start help a bit, but it is still quite congested at the beginning, especially with the downhill at the beginning. Weather is great, course is good and beautiful. Running on the F1 course is cool, and the first half along/around the island, the river and the old town is very cool. After the half marathoner left, course is open up. But that is in the residential area and start to get a bit lonely. The long stretch of back and fore is not that encouraging when seeing people running back already. Finish line is good, post race party is great. Bag pick up is still a bit too far, if can move closer to finish line is better. But overall is a very good race. Worth run again if live close by.
4.0

By: Rocky Morales

Posted: September 25, 2012

GREAT Marathon Experience In A Beautiful City!

I signed up for this marathon on a whim 7 months prior to the race when Competitor offered a Leap Year special on February 29th and I signed up for my hometown RNR Pasadena Half Marathon and threw in Montreal for just $59 just in case I got around to running it. Really, it was out of sight and out of mind for 6.5 months as I had hoped to be able to run a late October marathon in Europe. When Europe was not materializing, however, 10 days before RNR Montreal, I decided to book air and hotels for Montreal & Quebec City and have a go at this race, with neither low expectations nor high expectations. Well, out of my 97 marathons to date, this turned out to be a Top 5 marathon experience for me, a new PR and a race that I would return to run again and again in the future. The course was fantastic, like a mix between NYC/Paris/San Francisco and it was very well organized even with nearly 12,000 half marathoners and marathoners all starting together and running together for the first 12.8 miles or so. Although there were some pretty decent headwinds in parts of the race, the running temperatures were perfect, about 50 degrees at the start and no more than 60 degees at the finish (start time 8:30AM and I finished in 3:41, so right around 12:20pm with the Corral 5 start). I cannot say enough great things about this race but highlights for me were starting with a nice downhill off the Jacques Cartier Bridge, running 3+ miles on the Grand Prix race track, running through Old Montreal and finishing in a nice big park which was perfect for the post race concert. Although I didn't make it to Europe for a fall marathon, I think this marathon experience in French Canada would have been hard to have topped so I am very pleased with how it all turned out and, quite unexpectedly, got a new PR out of it. :)
5.0

By: John N.

Posted: September 24, 2012

tough but good course

This was my first run in Montreal. Some tough hills. Didn't enjoy the long straight stretches..great fans!Appreciated km markers and water stations and volunteers. GLad to have participated!
4.0

By: Sanjay M.

Posted: September 24, 2012

Not bad for a Canadian Race

My 39th Marathon! I enjoyed my stay in Montreal and the Delta hotel was first class. I snuck in a free shower in the pool on the fourth floor after the race! Pros: Bands: Very strong selection! t-shirt: Again, for a Canadian race - very good Fitness Expo: Good selection of products and well organized mile and KM markers post race party was good Cons: More toilets needed on course more frequent water stations better marking of fluids (sports drink not good enough) Vaseline sticks would be nice as well
3.0

By: Thomas Gaudette

Posted: October 04, 2011

What a beauty

2600 marathoners running in moderately warm weather this year on the streets and boulevards of this international city was as fine a marathon experience as it could be. It seemed to me that this was a much better racing situation than trying to run in a larger city with tens of thousands in the field. There were five 20 meter hills to manage. The first one felt unnoticable. The second and third hills were shorter, higher grade inclines that worked the quads modestly. The fourth and fifth hills were quite long, lower grade inclines that required some energy to meet. The fifth hill was significant because it began just after the 38th kilometer. Any training gaps or injury issue was painfully felt by the runners on this hill. The final ten kilometers of the race was significantly downhill except for the fifth 20 meter hill. For fit runners, this meant a free gallop to the finish. This nuanced city, Quebec people and marathon course provided a very fine cultural experience. Naturally, their course was fast and athletically balanced. I enjoyed this environment so I ran well. The host hotel added to this by their hospitality. Even with the Rock and Roll group as co-sponsor next year, I hope this marathon remains moderately sized, eclectic as the city and adequately athletic. Providing the same or similiar course would be a very good choice.
4.0

By: Carl A.

Posted: October 02, 2011

Great Race!

This was my second Montreal Marathon and again found it to be a tremendous experience. I'm a really slow runner so there were no congestion issues at the finish for me. I must compliment the race organizers for a job well done. Managing a race of 24,000 runners in Montreal - whew what a monumental task! Plenty of water stops and helpful volunteers. I really appreciated all the spectators - very friendly and supportive. On that humid Sunday I probably would never have made it to the finish without the encouragement. Merci Montreal! Great race!
5.0

By: Suzanne B.

Posted: September 30, 2011

Beautiful race; bring your own nutrition

This was my 5th marathon. The course was very scenic! It was a flat course too. There were a few spectators at spread out points. The finish was great! Lots of people cheering runners in. There were showers too, and no line, that was great. And a fun after race celebration. Great medal too (different for full and half, which is important)! One of the best tech shirts from a race I've ever got. Negatives: there was only one gel point, and maybe 3 banana and other food stations, not nearly enough, especially for a super hot day. It was a very crowded course with the 1/2 marathoners starting around the same time and in the same place the full marathoners, so it was crowded from about 25k to the finish.
4.0

By: Costas F.

Posted: September 27, 2011

Great views and fans, congested finish!!!

I have run the Montreal Marathon two years in a row, and the course is beautiful. You start on the La Ronde Island, and you complete one full loop of the Gilles Villeneuve F1 Circuit. Once you are done there, you head over to the Old Port and find your way through the unique neighbourhoods of Montreal. The finish is excellent!!! Unfortunately, the organization could be a lot better. Since the half-marathoners start 2 hours the marathoners, they catch up to you around the 25km mark. As a result, the last 17km of the marathon feels overcrowded and congested. I would suggest to start the Half-Marathon 1 hour after the marathon to avoid this problem. Also, the finish is very congested because there is no 'athletes rest area'...everyone is allowed to come in which makes it chaotic. Overall, the marathon course and fans are fantastic!!!
4.0

By: Savvas F.

Posted: September 27, 2011

A nice city-marathon, congested finish area!

The Montreal Marathon was my 10th marathon and glad to choose Montreal. Overall, it was enjoyable and scenic marathon, especially Olympic Stadium and first 10km in Gilles Villeneuve Track and La Ronde Island. The day was very hot and humid and the half-marathoners joined us about 25km into the race and it made the race very congested for the last 17km (my time was 3:45) so i didn't enjoy that part. The one issue is that the last sports drink is offered at 35k and a marathoner needs at least another sports drink station as its difficult to run the last 7K with only water. The finish area was a bit disorganized despite finishing at Parc Lafontaine, and minimum rest area for the athletes. Overall, Montreal is a nice city to do a marathon that incorporates much of Montreal landscapes and sights with good enthusiasm from spectators.
3.0

By: Sue B.

Posted: September 10, 2010

Great event!

A really nice marathon. Great course with lots to look at. Very well organized. Loved the signs telling you that water stations were coming up in 75 meters. Nice, short-sleeved, technical shirt too.
4.0

By: Julia K.

Posted: September 08, 2010

Great race, could have been better organized

I think this was a lovely event that could have been much better organized. The half marathoners started 2 hours after the full marathoners, so when the full marathoners got to their halfway point, about 2 hours later, the people running the half marathon flooded the already crowded streets and made it more challenging for the full marathoners on the course. The congestion could have been easily avoided if the half marathoners started as the same time as the full marathoners. Also, just when the streets were already congested and the aid stations already crowded beyond belief, the people running the 10K race were allowed on the same course. So just as I was getting to the 20-mile mark, the three different distances merged and the congestion was absolutely unnecessary. They could have started them at the same time as they started the marathon or the half marathon as well. I have no idea why they had to start 1 hour after the half marathoners and 3 hours after the full marathoners. So in effect, as the fast marathoners were entering the Olympic Stadium, so were the slow half marathoners and the even slower 10K runners. Are you kidding me? Who thought this was a good idea? All in all, a lovely city, a lovely course, good crowd support and a spectacular finish at the stadium sans the congestion. It was worth the trip.
4.0

By: brendan d.

Posted: September 06, 2010

great race; needs better organization at the end

Montreal was a great city to run through. Starting on the Jacques Cartier Bridge, running on the F1 track and finishing in Olympic Stadium make this race great. They have to fix the organization at the end of the race though (for example, few information booths, slow posting of finishing times, etc.). Organizers failed to post my time some 40 minutes after I finished. I also could not find the booth where my medal could be engraved. Also, the finisher's area was heavily congested, making it hard to get around.
4.0

By: Laurie Ferretti

Posted: August 17, 2010

by far the best run of the year on the island

This event is by far my favorite one of the year for its high energy, international participants and its turnout. While the course is challenging, with its hills and straightaways, it is well balanced. All in all, it makes for a great run for all levels of athletes.
4.0

By: Brian C.

Posted: June 30, 2010

Excellent course with friendly spectators.

Even if you're finishing at around five hours, there are still plenty of locals to cheer you on. The energy from the crowds improved my morale and shaved a bit off my time. It was a wonderful event!
5.0

By: Matt R.

Posted: December 10, 2009

Good

The only thing I have to complain about was the fact that I could count the number of porta-johns throughout the race on one hand - no joke. People were going in the middle of downtown Montreal, and if you weren't brave enough to do that, you had to stop and wait in line at one the few gas stations you'd pass.
3.0

By: Debra Stubbs

Posted: November 16, 2009

A fun, well-organized race in a beautiful city!

From the registration process to getting the official results online, this race was handled perfectly. Any and all information was readily available and I got quick answers to questions that I asked. We stayed in a hotel recommended by the marathon organization and it was great, perfectly situated. The race course was beautiful, giving us runners a great opportunity to see this beautiful city and the spectators were phenomenal, lining the course to cheer us on and encourage us to keep going. "Ne lachez pas" ("don't give up") was the phrase of the day. The water and feed stations were plentiful and adequately manned and it was just a pleasure to be running that day. The finish in the Olympic Arena was spectacular and the post-race food was a well thought out, with a well balanced blend of protein, carbs, dairy and juices. Seeing your picture on the huge Jumbotron as you entered the stadium was so great, and hearing your name called as you approached the finish line was incredible. The results were posted quickly and efficiently, and the medals and certificates given to all runners are a great reminder of such a wonderful race. I recommend this race to anyone considering running a marathon.
5.0

By: Thor K.

Posted: September 29, 2009

Spectacular Course/Organization Getting Better

I chose Montreal to be my 50th marathon, and I was very glad I did. Hands down, the highlight was the course. I won't go into details of it, but it was varied in terrain and sights, and it was one of my favorites to date. I loved the start on the bridge, the run around the antiquated amusement park, the run to the island with the formula race track, then the run to Montreal Island and through the city streets and neighborhoods, complete with an amazing finish in Olympic Stadium. Sure, there are sections that were, shall I say, boring, but to be honest, there is only one marathon I have ever run where you never have a dull stretch (London Marathon). Spectator support was minimal, especially when compared to other "city" marathons, but the course helped bridge that deficit. The support, when it was there, was very enthusiastic. It appeared like most spectators were family of the runners rather than city people coming out to cheer the event on, such as what happens at the big-city marathons. The sport drink on the course isn't nearly as bad as some claim. It was very much like Gatorade. If you have a troublesome stomach, you probably need to start drinking different stuff on your long runs. It'll harden the stomach for anything. The finish in Olympic Stadium was amazing. Period. The stadium seats weren't filled, but the vibe was amazing, especially considering that runners from all the other events were there waiting for marathon finishers. If you are a three-hour marathoner, you will be running by yourself from about 15K on. But you're probably used to that already. The expo was very small. They could improve that. But again, run enough of these and you realize that it is only the big-city marathons that have big expos. Montreal is getting to be a big-city marathon, but it's not there yet. Which is actually why I like it. Because it retains a homey, lower-key feel to it. It would have been nice for the adjoining half-marathon to go off before the marathon. The half was delayed by 15 minutes, which meant the marathon was delayed even more. Most marathoners wanted to get going. And I don't blame them. The finish area in the stadium was good, but it would have been far less crowded and easier to walk around if bikes weren't allowed in the area. Bikes were there because of the adjoining 40K TT bike race that was a part of the events. Post-race food was lame. But you know what? I don't really care much about that. I always go out for a burger and beer after a marathon. Post-race food, in my estimation, is just to tide you over. If you have run a handful of marathons, this is not a PR course. It isn't a killer course. But the hills - long, gradual ones (not short ones, or long and steep ones) come alive after halfway. And it can be windy. So if you're racing marathons, rather than pacing to finish, and if you've done a number of them, you will not get your PR here. But don't turn away from this course because of it. It's really a very nice, varied course. One of my favorites. In all, Montreal puts on a great event. It is not perfect, and it is growing bigger and bigger, but the course is a sure highlight. Maybe in a few years this will become a big-city marathon, and at that time we can talk about the expo and spectators and such. But it's not there yet. So you can't expect it.
3.0

By: Celeste S.

Posted: September 28, 2009

Great first marathon in a great city!

This was my first marathon. I selected this city because it was in the same time-zone, at sea-level and has a cooler climate than Puerto Rico. With all the information I was sent online, I had no problems getting around and finding everything I needed at the expo. I was not impressed with the clothes for sale. I expected to spend hundreds and just walked away with a shirt that I wasn't thrilled with. The clothes were all for winter climates and not very feminine. Arriving at the race was easy. The other marathoners were friendly and in good spirits. Having trained in Puerto Rico, I considered it to be cold, but the weather was perfect once we got going. My fingertips were still cold at the halfway-mark. I really recommend this race for anyone from the Caribbean or from southern states. After a summer of training, this will be a breeze. The city was beautiful and the course took us by lots of water, through parks and quaint neighborhoods. The hills were not steep but long. The woman who gave me my medal at the finish line gave me the most sincere congratulations in French. The food at the end consisted of yogurt, a banana, juices, water, bagel with peanut butter and some other things. There was no yoga class after, as advertised. That was a disappointment. There was no massage after, as advertised. Another disappointment. The subway station was right at the finish, so it was easy to get back to my hotel. The coolest thing about this marathon was that it was in Montreal. I was traveling with my four-year-old daughter and we had an amazing vacation afterward. There are so many things to do. The city has an amusement park, the botanical garden, biodome and biosphere, all of which are great for children. We had so much fun. The tourist area is very easy to get around. We did at least two things for kids per day. Most things are free for four-year-olds. Do the marathon and vacation with your family. We had a blast! What a cool city!
5.0

By: Tim J.

Posted: September 16, 2009

Charming Race with an European Flavor

It's not the largest race, and not the most organized... but it's very charming. Since 2003, the race organizers have managed to improve the quality of this race every year. The course is scenic (it takes you through historic Old Montreal) and challenging, with a major climb at 26K. The race also attracts a large number of Europeans, which gives the event an international flavor. Most importantly, the race is lined with many, many beautiful Quebec women who enthusiastically cheer for all runners. An ideal race for Americans who want to run an international race without the high cost of air travel to Europe.
4.0

By: John W.

Posted: September 15, 2009

The course is OK, except the start and finish

The course overall was OK, with the start and finish being the exceptions. My main complaints are the expo and lack of support from the city itself. The expo was very disappointing. This was my son's first marathon and we could not find any merchandise worth buying for him as a souvenir. If you go to the website they still don't list anything, and just refer you to the expo. Also, the city doesn't show much support. There were few spectators, and they could learn a lesson from Boston and let runners ride the metro free on race day. That's a nice show of support from the City of Boston.
3.0

By: Ted J.

Posted: September 15, 2009

could become an institution

They said attendance was up 60%(!) this year and it is easy to see why: beautiful course, early fall season, mostly flat terrain, very organized. To the other posts I would add that some are being stingy about the course. Between multiple cityscape vistas, the section on the race track, long stretches along the river, the part through Old Montreal, and the finish at the Olympic Stadium, I think you'd be hard-pressed to beat this course for scenic beauty. Another pro is the sponge stations. I believe there were more than at the other two marathons I've done, and they were very much appreciated. Finally, when there were fans, they were very supportive - a few sections of the course were good and noisy. ;-) I'd guess that fans are increasing with the number of runners. As an American, there was something very cool about being cheered along in French for just a couple-hour car ride. The major con I'd emphasize is the "sport drink." OASIS is the premier sponsor, hence their orange drink at the aid stations. But as they're owned by Coke, you'd think a PowerAde option would be easy enough. I've never suffered from cramping before, but I did here, starting at mile 16. My hunch is that it was due to a lack of sodium/electrolytes in the course-supplied hydration.
4.0

By: Be B.

Posted: September 15, 2009

A good first marathon to run

This is a good marathon. The course had MINIMAL hills and closed streets to cars. The end is downhill. The weather was great so there were spectators out. The number of runners was great - it was not too crowded, but I never felt alone. A decent number of water stations with ample water, food, sports drink (called "juice" by most volunteers, but it was a Gatorade-like drink), and sponges. I did not have to wait for anything (picked up race packet on Saturday afternoon). The shirt did run small. The hotel was adequately priced and close to the metro. The race did start late, so it was hard for my family members to know if they missed me or if I hadn't passed yet. The only con was that the wheelchair race and bike started AFTER the marathon. I felt pummeled by the bikes. And it was hard to get around slower people at the beginning of the race, but the narrowness did not last long.
4.0

By: Don K.

Posted: September 14, 2009

Beautiful, and much potential!!

Major pros of this marathon: The city (beautiful to visit and run through). The volunteers (thanks). The start (on the bridge) and the finish (at the Olympic stadium; it's wonderful to run the same finish as the 1976 Olympic marathon). Major cons: Registration (lineups!!!) - It was the first time that I've seen anything like it. I was not pleased to be standing and waiting the day before a marathon. They had a water station halfway up the largest hill - a terrible location for it - and there were far too few portable toilets at the start. Perhaps they could have some school buses to get the runners closer to the start from the metro. That would have helped. I was not happy to walk close to 2 kilometers merely to get to the start. They used a surprisingly small exhibit hall, given the number of runners; why wasn't there more activity? The weather was too warm - up above 20 degrees Celsius at the finish - which often happens in early September in Montreal. That's about it. The pros definitely outweighed the cons, and the city and course are quite spectacular. It also gives you a wonderful taste of the unique culture of French Canada.
3.0

By: Matthew W.

Posted: September 14, 2009

Eh

I had been told that this marathon was relatively flat, which is not true. Most of it is flat, but there are at least five regions of climb, three of which are quite steep. I will say that the water stations were well placed, and running into the Olympic stadium at the end was great. The overall organization needed a boost as well; the marathon was scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m., but they had to push back the start time due to there being too many participants in the half-marathon. Overall okay, not great. I wouldn't go again, but I don't regret going.
2.0

By: Hugues F.

Posted: September 14, 2009

Perfect race! Breathtaking moments!

The start on Jacques-Cartier Bridge was amazing. Montrealers, spectators and fellow runners are very friendly. There were many fans at the starting line, a lots of fans along the course, and an amazing crowd at the arrival. I actually felt like an Olympic champion when I crossed the finish line, with the loud and continued cheering and applause. There were lots of service stations, with gel, water, bananas, sponges, medical support, port-o-potties and sport drink. I picked-up my bag at the expo on Saturday afternoon and didn't have to wait at all. There was a nice, blue tech-shirt, a beautiful medal, and a perfect post-race recovery lunch. However, the line-up at the lunch pick-up area in the stadium was definitely too long! But the race in general was so well organized that it was worth it. I will be back next year. The arrival in the Olympic stadium makes it one of the best I've ever run.
5.0

By: Charles-Eric l.

Posted: September 13, 2009

Great marathon... but it could be much better!

This race was my second marathon, and I have run plenty of other races, including a few half-marathons. The Montreal Marathon could be a wonderful, nearly-perfect race with a few improvements. Here are my pros and cons: PROS: -The start on the Jacques-Cartier Bridge and finish in the Olympic Stadium were both unique and spectacular. -The course could be better but it is very varied. It includes the formula 1 circuit, bridges, downtown Montreal, parks, etc. -Bag check is efficient, considering the distance between the start and finish. -Metro makes the travel to the start and from the finish quite easy, although a 1K walk is required to the start (the price to pay for the bridge!). -The aid stations are not as plentiful as at other marathons, but they are well spaced - 3-4 with sponges, 1 with gels, 2-3 with bananas (I prefer oranges...), etc.. -Spectators were great in the last few miles of the course. CONS: - There was a very long line at the expo for the race kit pick-up. Considering that they are getting a very important increase of the number of participants, the extra money should be used to correct this. -Some parts of the course are extremely boring, with a few badly maintained streets. A few improvements would be great. -Spectators were not too cheerful inside of the stadium. :( THE WORST: -They use a local "kind of copy" of the Gatorade formula not available to try before the race. It is citrus flavor - not too good and sweeter than Gatorade. I had a hard time with my digestion. I prefer the lime Gatorade used in most races... and everybody is used to it. -The food in the finish area was a little cheap, considering the size of the event. I got a peanut butter bagel with a small yogurt, juice, a mini-pack of almonds, one apple, one banana, and a mini-mini piece of cheese. There is huge room for improvement on this score. Overall, a nice marathon, and a good experience worth a try.... but my first race, elsewhere, ranks well above this one.
4.0

By: Bridget P.

Posted: September 13, 2009

Nice run, but long lines for everything.

I live in Montreal, but have never run the half-marathon until this year. Positives: 1. Nice course 2. Great volunteers 3. Water/gel/banana stations were well spaced and easily accessible (except the one hill on Berri) 4. Bag pick-up: shortest line Negatives: 1. Race kit pickup took 45 minutes, with many people wondering where the actual line was. Signs could have been clearer, and more space was needed 2. Post-race: More ridiculous lines. After a 30-minute wait, I was still so far away that I left. 3. There was a lack of medical staff at the finish, and it was very crowded. Conclusion: I think that they have too many events taking place and cannot handle the sheer number of participants. On a smaller scale, it would be great.
3.0

By: Steve K. B.

Posted: February 08, 2009

Fabulous!!

The race was very well-organized, in a friendly city, with great volunteers. My wife walked the half-marathon and loved it too. The arrival in the Olympic Stadium was a breathtaking moment.
5.0

By: Sergio P.

Posted: November 04, 2008

Highly recommended

This was my second marathon; during the race I got PB's in the full, half, 10K and the mile, plus I managed to reduce 50 minutes from my previous marathon 10 months before, so I feel very happy looking back at Montreal and my comment may not be that objective. ;-) Overall, highly recommendable, you will not regret it. My experience was a bit damp and chilly since Hurricane Ike caused out-of-season pours in south Canada. The first kilometers were run under the chilly rain, and the cheering crowd was kind of scared away. That is why I rated 3 on the spectators, but surely they will turn out in larger groups in a "normal" September morning. Positives: 1. The expo was installed in the underground mall of the hotel I was staying, so it was very convenient. The same underground complex has a subway station, so no hassle on race day. 2. The subway is very convenient to reach the start line. It was full of other runners, so you may want to decide to follow the pack instead of following a subway map to know when you have to get off. A warning: there are several races going on the same day, all ending at the Olympic stadium, but with different starting lines, so the pack you are following may actually be going to the 5K starting line, or the 10K one! (That happened to me; I skipped a couple of stops inadvertently.) 3. The first 10K are very nice; I got to see some world landmarks from the 60's (I was born in the 70's and did not know much about the Expo '67), but the highlight at the beginning is running in the F1 circuit. There was only a handful of supporters cheering us on in that part, but I guess that many people didn't feel like traveling to the racetrack island on a rainy day. Anyway, now I can boast that I have actually - and literally - run in an F1 racetrack. ;-) 4. About 90% of the course is a beauty worth seeing. Lots of historic sites and beautiful neighborhoods. I recommend to look at the marathon website to get a first glimpse of what you'll see, so the sightseeing during the race is more enjoyable. 5. The course is very friendly to runners' companions. My wife and my mother went to Montreal to cheer me on, so we took a printout of the course the day before, and marked a few spots where they might see me at specific times into the race. They used the subway all the time, and we met at KM 22, KM 30 and KM 40, plus they were able to get on time to the finish line at my arrival! That helped a lot - not only because the lots of extra energy that I got from their support, but also because they were my "supply backup" and were handing me water, Gatorade and almonds in our meeting points. If you travel with companion spectators to your races, this one is for you - I hope all the marathons were this way, it is simply great! 6. The finish in the Olympic Stadium beats everything; you forget all the pain and exhaustion when you see you are almost there. I have finished a few 10K races in the Olympic Stadium of Mexico City (from the Mexico 68 summer games), but finishing a full marathon in the Olympic Stadium surely beats it. 7. Organization is very good. The website may not seem too flashy, but it's got everything. They also have a Facebook group. Combine the website with the FB group, and you are all set to get all your concerns and doubts cleared, and know what you can expect months in advance (except hurricanes, of course). 8. Volunteers. They deserve a BIG thank you. They endured the rainy and chilly weather to make sure that us runners were not lacking anything. Awesome; thank you, guys. 9. Medics/paramedics. I did not need them, but it was reassuring that they were present almost all the time. Paramedics were cycling the course back and forth making sure any potential emergency was immediately covered. I got to see them in action a couple of times. 10. Cheering crowd. Very thin, but once again, I blame the weather. The few folks that were out there were very supportive and nice to watch. Negatives: 1. I did not see any sports drink before, during or after the race. Only water and orange juice. I found this very, very weird. Maybe the stations were there and I just simply missed them, but the fact is that I don't recall seeing them. If I'm right, then I think that Oasis overdid it a bit; for next time I'd plan for a few sport drinks stations along the course 2. The Olympic Stadium is very deteriorated, worn out and looks poorly maintained. Its best times clearly passed 30 years ago; the stadium is not used for track competitions anymore. It seems that the venue is now only used a few times a year nowadays. The finish experience is still fantastic, but the backdrop is kind of gloomy. 3. I was expecting more "goodies" for the finishers besides the medal (very nice, by the way). No blanket. I had to figure out the procedure to get some food and drink. I had to wait in line with a cardboard plate to receive a meager portion of food and a banana; I felt kind of a hurricane refugee. 4. Entertainment during the course was scarce. It may have been the rain (one jazz band had to stay under a bridge to keep playing), but I was expecting more - I'm sure that Montreal can do better! Anyway, I've read that the marathon has been constantly improving, and I am sure that they can work around all of my "negatives" (well, perhaps point 2 is not that easy or under their control). Overall, it is a very positive experience that I highly recommend!
4.0

By: Carl A.

Posted: September 18, 2008

Difficult run, but really good marathon

Although I've run numerous half marathons, this was only my second marathon. Despite a pitiful performance on my part, I really enjoyed myself. Montreal is a wonderful city and the race was organized quite well. I was a little apprehensive about taking the metro to the start but it turned out to be no problem (with all the runners on the metro, even I couldn't get lost). The start on the Jacques Cartier Bridge and running on the islands in the St. Lawrence River were both impressive. The folks at the aid stations did a great job! The weather probably held down spectator support, but the people were all very friendly. Some might consider this course fairly easy, but to an old flat-lander with aching knees, the hills and inclines encountered are unforgiving. I would definitely encourage people to run this marathon - but be ready!
4.0

By: Flannery O.

Posted: September 18, 2008

Great Course; Fantastic Finish!

First half of course: Starting off on the Jacques Cartier Bridge was unique (albeit rainy and windy). The start was covered in both French and English. The first 10 to 12K are through St. Helene and Notre Dame Islands. The upside to this is that you pass by a lot of greenery, beautiful water and city views, and there are even a few roller coasters along the trail. The downside is that if you need some encouragement from spectators early on, then you are largely out of luck. Because these islands are largely made up of parks, spectators would have had to make a long trek in the pouring rain in order to get to the course. The few that did this were much appreciated. Around 12K, you can see cool, stacked apartment buildings to your left. Then there is a more industrial look until you hit Old Montreal. I generally like how the course started in a simpler environment with fewer spectators because it forced me to get in the zone. Second half of course: This part starts off in the heart of Montreal. There were more spectators here, though the aforementioned rain and wind kept the crowds thin or nonexistent. The scenery here and huge enthusiasm from the spectators was a great mental lift. There are 3 hills that I remember on this part of the course. The most notable one was about 5K out from the end of the course. I liked how the half marathon, 10K and 5K were run on the tail end of the marathon course because it gave me good course goals and positive reinforcement. It also pulled more spectators because they could come to cheer on the start of one of the shorter races and stay to cheer on the 1/2 marathon and full marathon. I also liked how they posted historical landmarks on the website, as I used the landmarks as goals in my run. The course ends with 300 meters in the Olympic Stadium. They said my name and my home country, and I must say that I felt like an Olympian! Too cool! Very cool medal, also. Liquids/Supplements: There were consistent water, Gatorade, juice, sponge, and orange stops. I would encourage non-French speakers to familiarize themselves with the words for water (eau) and juice (jus) to avoid confusion. "Jus" is NOT Gatorade; "Gatorade" = Gatorade. I loved Montreal before this race, and now I love it all the more. I truly enjoyed running the marathon here, and would gladly do so again. Merci, Montreal!
4.0

By: Olivier Dumoulin

Posted: September 15, 2008

2008 - Much improved organization, hard course

This marathon is gaining a lot in terms of organization; most (if not all) of the major criticisms below have been addressed. This is not a huge event, so some of the little touches are absent; but drink stations were efficient, services for runners were excellent, and medals were nice. Spectators were enthusiastic, but there were fewer of them than I've seen elsewhere, Overall, this is definitely worth running, and it's getting better each year. A very hard run this year due to humid weather, but I would do it again! I give it 4 out of 5.
4.0

By: Pete B.

Posted: August 06, 2008

A must-do!!!

This marathon has greatly improved since the last year's, and Montreal's marathon became, in 2007, one of the best races I have ever run. Weather was perfect, the course is enjoyable, and the crowd gets better every year. The finish in the Olympic Stadium is unique. I will definitely sign up for 2008 and will plan to stay a little longer in that great city. Congratulations to the organizing committee and thank you for this wonderful experience.
5.0

By: Steve M.

Posted: February 08, 2008

Not a great event...

Even if we start on a bridge and complete the marathon in the stadium, something is missing: No Gatorade (only Oasis juice... not a good idea to try something new during a marathon). Not enough spectators, and a race map is also needed. I did it twice because it's close to my home and this is a secure race.
3.0

By: Sarah T.

Posted: October 22, 2007

fun first marathon

I did this in 2006 and the weather was perfect. Not too hilly at all, and the fans all cheered me on in french, which was motivating. I love Montreal, so I thought the whole thing was beautiful. The best part was the start on the Jacques-Cartier bridge. They could have done more announcing in English, since it's an international marathon and not everyone understands french, but overall it was good. There was not as much food as there could have been (all i remember is a table with yogurt and juice).
5.0

By: Marc L.

Posted: September 25, 2007

There is room for improvement...

One thing about the course: They should better evaluate the actual streets we are running on. The overwhelming smell of garbage, car exhaust and sewers in the city was very unpleasant. And since you really need a lot of oxygen for running, that was nauseating. As for the organization, it would seem to me that to actually reach the starting point on the bridge is in itself an achievement. No shuttle bus of any kind were offered. You can take the subway to a station about 15 minutes or so from the starting point. Having to walk/jog uphill just to get in line is not really pleasant.... Not really a lot of spectators along the street. There are some at some intersections but people in the city aren't even aware of why the streets are closed and why there are people running on them.... All in all, a lot of room for improvement. Seems like I just did a lot of bitching about it but I actually cut my time by about 22 minutes. I'll be there next year for sure. I just want them to improve.
3.0

By: Josh O.

Posted: September 18, 2007

Good Experience

This was my first marathon and I had a great experience. I was worried going into the race that there would be NO spectators. This was not the case. Many of the smaller races in Philadelphia that I've run (1/2 and 10-miler) are well populated with fans from start to finish. Although Montreal did not have as many fans as I'm used to, there were still a good number of people cheering us on! I'm sure as the race becomes more well-known, the fans will increase in number. I thought the course was great and offered a lot of different types of scenery. I actually preferred the second half better to the first half, but that's just me. I thought the organization with fine and from what I read going in the organizers seem to listen to the suggestions and are committed to a better race each year. I do think there still could be some more volunteers at the water stations, but other than that, I'm extremely happy I made the trip up to Montreal!
4.0

By: Joan Roch

Posted: September 10, 2007

Getting better

The highlights of this race definitely are its start and finish: you'll start from the Jacques-Cartier Bridge overlooking the Saint-Laurent River and the Montreal skyline and finish into the Olympic stadium. Beware the somewhat hilly route! On the negative side, the spectators are too few and most Montrealers are not even aware that this event is taking place. Hopefully, they gradually will show up in greater number. Please note that the organization is getting way better than it was and is now perfectly adequate for runners of all levels. I'll run it again!
4.0

By: Heidi N.

Posted: November 16, 2006

Great course, but few spectators

This was my first marathon so I really didn't know what to expect. I ran with my husband and a good friend of ours. The race was great. What a beautiful city and a variety of things to see. The Formula 1 course is the highlight of this race!!! I was disappointed in the spectators though. To have people cheering you on is so important! There were streches along the course where there was nobody. Even at the finish line, there weren't many people. What a disappointment. Also, when we first got to the airport and told the lady at imigration that we were in the city to run the marathon - she didn't even know that there was a marathon (the same happened to us in restaurants in the city). This race needs more support from the people!!!!
3.0

By: Tracy K.

Posted: September 21, 2006

Great course, awesome finish line, well organized

The course was nice and very scenic, with lots of entertainment and other diversions. I ran the half and was not backed up by walkers, like I was in Ottawa. Finishing in Olympic Stadium was the highlight - that really made it unique. My only negative comment: I went to the pasta dinner (the first year they've done one) and it wasn't worth $20. The pasta was good, but salad, drinks and dessert were almost non-existent. Needs some good salads and one or two desserts to make it worthwhile next time.
4.0

By: Zoe G.

Posted: September 21, 2006

My first, and I loved it!

This was my first marathon and while I agree that more spectator support would have been nice, overall it was a great race. The aid stations were well placed, the course had a little bit of everything (not boring at all, in my opinion), and I loved running into the stadium. I never even saw the food at the end, and found no reason to stick around - I guess that's my one criticism. Overall, fabulous!
3.0

By: Cam Dickson

Posted: September 13, 2006

Nice course, terrible fan support

Only ran the half but was very disappointed by the lack of fan support along the course and in Olympic Stadium. The course was nice and I like the staggered start time (the marathon started half an hour later). Expo was brutal!
3.0

By: Steve D.

Posted: September 12, 2006

Horrible organization

I was looking forward to finishing the race in the same stadium that Olympic marathoners finished in back in 1976. Too bad the finish area was so poorly organized. Instead of getting food (which they ran out of) I stood in line for an hour and 15 minutes trying to get my checked bag of sweats. There were virtually no spectators and although the course started scenic and finished in the stadium, the rest was boring. This was not a well organized event. How appropriate that it finished in the Olympic stadium which itself is a monument to the poorly organized city!
2.0

By: Cecile B.

Posted: September 11, 2006

100% improvement in 2006!

I think the organizers read comments from the last two years on MarathonGuide.com! This is my second Montreal Marathon. It was a perfect day, in a beautiful city (and a PB to boot), with a really great course - and the organization has improved 100%. The expo was much better than last year (although it would be great to have more running specialty stores in there, just like Ottawa.... Maybe Sport Expert - main sponsor - is afraid of competition?). They now give water in paper cups instead of bottles. Arriving in the stadium was awesome. Maybe they need more volunteers at aid stations Overall, a great destination. Unique ambiance, with cyclists riding alongside the runners (not interfering at all with the running course). I will return next year for sure.
4.0

By: Alain H.

Posted: January 16, 2006

Good marathon for a first one

I actually appreciated the Montreal Marathon. It was my first one and not my last one. I really like the first 14K, the start from the bridge, and the run into the attraction park island; Formula 1 course I think is the best part on that course. The end in the stadium wasn't so good. I was a slow runner, finishing in 4:44 and almost nobody was there to acclaim us except maybe my dad. :-0 The food was disappointing at the end. Top 5 good points: 1 - Start and first 14K of running. 2 - Spectators along the first half of the course. 3 - Friendly runners. 4 - Finishing medals. 5 - Weather was excellent. Top 3 bad points: 1 - No power gel at aid stations. 2 - No orange juice and lack of food. 3 - Arrival at stadium maybe next year will be better. :-0
4.0

By: Kevin L.

Posted: January 06, 2006

Pathetic organization

While I only ran the half in preparation for a full in Vegas, I was extremely disappointed. The water stations gave out half-liter bottles of water (I only need a couple of gulps) which resulted in hundreds of nearly full bottles all over the course (careful you don't sprain/break an ankle). Congestion near the end as you share with walkers and 10K runners ensure that you will be challenged for a PB. Organization at the end was terrible, food poor (both set-up and quality/variety) and to add insult to it all, the most hideous t-shirts I have ever received at a full or half marathon. I live in Montreal, but will never race this one again. The organizers may need to visit or run a marathon almost anywhere else to see how it should be done.
1.0

By: Daniel H.

Posted: September 28, 2005

Great

Great race. Great city, beautiful course, and friendly spectators. I loved the finish in the Olympic Stadium.
5.0

By: Susan M.

Posted: September 13, 2005

Not that spectacular

This marathon still has a long way to go. The start on the bridge is great. The course is not that impressive and the water stations are much disorganized. There are only a few volunteers (4 or 5) to hand you a bottle of water. I had to slow down considerably and actually had to stop at the last two stations. I was stuck with the walkers who were taking all the space. With all the walkers and the cyclists on the same course, this is definitely not an event for runners. The finish in the stadium was mayhem. I was expecting so much and was soooo disappointed. Because of the way it was set up, there was almost no one to cheer you on once you got in the stadium. Just a few feet after crossing the finish line, there were volunteers handing out medals. No medical in sight; the guy next to me held me for a while. I needed space but there was none. It took what seems hours to get the chip removed. After finally getting out of there and getting some water, there was a huge line up for food. When I eventually got there, there were trays of cantaloupes and grapes filled up by volunteers with no gloves on. Dripping sweat runners were serving themselves. I saw this guy touching just about every piece of cantaloupe to get the biggest one. I almost threw up and got out of there. It was all they had anyway: grapes, cantaloupe and a little cup of apple sauce. The sound in the stadium was just too much, I just wanted to get out of there. Sorry Montreal, I will stick with Ottawa and Quebec City.
2.0

By: Susan M.

Posted: September 13, 2005

Not that spectacular

This marathon still has a long way to go. The start on the bridge is great. The course is not that impressive and the water stations are much disorganized. There are only a few volunteers (4 or 5) to hand you a bottle of water. I had to slow down considerably and actually had to stop at the last two stations. I was stuck with the walkers who were taking all the space. With all the walkers and the cyclists on the same course, this is definitely not an event for runners. The finish in the stadium was mayhem. I was expecting so much and was soooo disappointed. Because of the way it was set up, there was almost no one to cheer you on once you got in the stadium. Just a few feet after crossing the finish line, there were volunteers handing out medals. No medical in sight, the guy next to me held me for a while. I needed space but there was none. It took what seems hours to get the chip removed. After finally getting out of there and getting some water, there was a huge line up for food. When I eventually got there, there were trays of cantaloupes and grapes filled up by volunteers with no gloves on. Dripping sweat runners were serving themselves. I saw this guy touching just about every piece of cantaloupe to get the biggest one. I almost threw up and got out of there. It was all they had anyway: grapes, cantaloupe and a little cup of apple sauce. The sound in the stadium was just too much, I just wanted to get out of there. Sorry Montreal, I will stick with Ottawa and Quebec City.
2.0

By: John M.

Posted: September 13, 2005

Beautiful course in a beautiful city.

Whatever I may say hereafter is not intended to discourage anybody from running this race, as I had a very positive overall experience. The start of the course goes through the area where the 1967 World's Fair was held and is strikingly beautiful, especially R. Buckminster Fuller's geodesic dome, which was the U.S. Pavillion. The first half of the marathon is essentially flat. While there are bicyclists and rollerbladers following the same course, they are in separate lanes and are not a problem. This is a metric race, so you would do yourself a service to figure out your pace in km/hr beforehand. I had run about 10k before I figured out how fast I was going. The fans are somewhat sparse, but what they lack in numbers they more than make up for in friendliness and enthusiasm. There were no sections of cobblestone, as I had heard about back in the '80's, and the pavement was predominantly good and even with few sections cambered to a noticeable degree. While there are some uphill climbs in the latter half of the race they are not so hideously steep that they break your heart. While this is definitely a destination race, with fantastic restaurants, entertainment and shopping, it is also a decent course to run, and I was able to turn in my second best time ever. It would be helpful to brush up on your high school French before going, as the race instructions at the start, with the exception of the Mayor of Montreal's welcome to international runners, were in French. In those instances where I was not able to understand particular instructions there was always somebody local ready, willing and able to translate the essentials. The start is a bit of a hike from the Metro station where the bag drop off was located, so I would definitely suggest that you bring a plastic bag or throwaway shirt to keep you warm while you are waiting for the start. There were plenty of water stops, and sponges were a nice touch through the latter parts of the race. Where else will the spectators shout 'Bravo!' for you?
4.0

By: Sean T.

Posted: September 13, 2005

everything was great

As a transplanted Montrealer who has run several marathons in the states, I was eager to return to my hometown and see how its race compared. I can happily say it passed with flying colors. The organization seemed flawless (none of the day's other races interfered with the marathon), the course was scenic and not too tough, and the spectators were supportive. Starting way up on the Jacques Cartier bridge was great, as was finishing in the Olympic Stadium. Whatever problems they may have had in recent years seem to have been ironed out. Oasis, a juice company, is the sponsor, so water stops gave out juice and h2o. If you need a sports drink you have to carry it with you, but I do that anyhow so it wasn't a problem.
5.0

By: Pierre T.

Posted: September 12, 2005

Marathon de Montreal 2005

Montreal is a great city with great people. This was my second marathon and I ran both in Montreal. It was a great feeling to finish the run on a giant TV SCREEN in the stadium hearing your name and position on the big speakers! This was the third Marathon de Montreal after an interruption for almost 15 years! So, even though I would have like more GEL on the course, I think Montreal is going to be a must run rendez-vous in a very near future !
3.0

By: Paul B.

Posted: September 12, 2005

Lot of place for improvment...

In order to survive, this organization needs to improve the cleaning at water stops, find a way to better manage walkers blocking the way for runners, give more place to runners at the finishing line, get more or better sponsers and install a real running track inside the stadium (arrival) and finally find a way to attract some spectators along the race. Oh yes, don't expect an exciting lunch at the arrival...
2.0

By: Pierre B.

Posted: September 11, 2005

Heading in the right direction with stadium finish

I enjoyed the course this year, which is more interesting and scenic (I ran the half); the stadium finish is a great idea (an open roof would be nice, though). Well organized; perhaps juices or sports drinks at more stations would be better.
4.0

By: Nestor Lewyckyj

Posted: September 21, 2004

The organization for the race was superb

The water stops were plentiful and only 3 km apart. They need to work on making the course through a more habitated part of Montreal, instead of through the industrial waste land and Ile Ste Helene.
4.0

By: Andrei Ordine

Posted: September 13, 2004

Great race

The course for 2004 race is scenic, with great views of the city's business district, and flat - well, except the last 4k in the downtown. If you like running in urban areas, this is the right marathon. Organization was good, almost all information was available. 4 out of 5 stars for making up after a loss of brand value in 2003.
4.0

By: Jean P.

Posted: June 17, 2004

Stay positive!

I am a marathon runner from Montreal and very proud that the Montreal International Marathon is back in our beautiful city. I ran it last year knowing it would not be perfect after a 13-year absence, but I realized that the organizers did their best to accommodate everybody. I did send them my comments on improvements that I believe should be made, and received a positive answer the next day, just like Mr. Hopper's comments on this website. My reaction follows comments I read on your site from a certain F.L. This sort of negative attitude and insulting language is, in my mind, surely not the way to improve any situation. By sending them positive comments I am convinced they will improve the quality of their marathon sooner and faster and will get very soon a reputation as good as Ottawa's organization. By the way, they told me they are working on a new permanent course with the finish line in the Olympic Stadium for the 2005 edition. See you on the Jacques-Cartier Bridge where you can enjoy a look at this great city!
5.0

By: FF L.

Posted: June 11, 2004

Canada's Absolute Worst

Absolute worst in Canada. I’ve commented elsewhere on this site about Ottawa being the absolute best marathon in Canada; now for the absolute worst: Montreal International Marathon. It is definitely NOT a runner-friendly event! The so-called marathon is but one of many activities included in the “Festival de la Santé” (loosely translated: Health/Fitness Festival). Runners have to put up with roller-bladers, cyclists, and walkers on the same course, and not only that, but they are also greatly outnumbered. The organization is terrible and the course takes you through some of the city’s most uninspiring streets. Not enough volunteers (maybe that’s why they give out bottled-water !). Don’t get fooled by the name: there isn’t anything world-class about the Montreal International Marathon. I doubt that the organizers know very much about running, much less about marathons. It is quite obvious that they came up with the marathon event only to get more government funding for the whole festival, not to cater to runners. Good news for roller-bladers, walkers and cyclists, bad news for runners. Being a proud Montrealer and avid runner, I’m really ashamed about the fact that Montreal is associated with this event. But then again what can you expect from the same people who lured hundreds of runners into a 10k race that turned out to be 11.4k long two years ago? My comments may be harsh, but they're fairly close to most of the Montreal running community's opinions. If you're looking for a marathon/travel destination around this part of the world, I would have the following advice: do the Quebec City Marathon in late August and then come by Montreal for some rest ! :-)
1.0

By: Jack B.

Posted: June 08, 2004

Wow!

I participated last year and I have to say that the Montreal Marathon was good, in general. The course was great: running through the F1 circuit, the old port of Montreal, and Chinatown was a real pleasure. I do not agree with other comments about that race. I think there is always room for improvement, but for sure, the Montreal's Marathon was well organized and I'll take my place on the Jacques-Cartier Bridge this year on September 12th for another new start!
4.0

By: Michael Hopper

Posted: June 03, 2004

I will run in 2004

I will run Montreal in 2004. I have spoken to the organizers of this year`s edition and have been assured that the concerns mentioned in the comments from 2003 runners have been addressed. Montreal is such a fantastic city - I hope anyone wanting to visit this cosmopolitan city and run through some of its more scenic areas will register. If in doubt about the organization, please email them - they responded to me within 24 hours. See you at the finish line and good luck!!
3.0

By: Tim S.

Posted: May 10, 2004

Good start, lonely middle and hectic finish

The 2003 edition was to be the return of a great Montreal tradition. Unfortunately, this was not the case. The marathon is but one of many events taking place on the same day and course. The start on the bridge was fun and the run around the small islands was a good way to get warmed up, but the middle section, which winds its way through a quiet industrial sector, was the worst. The heavy traffic (cyclists, inline skaters, walkers, halfers and 10kers) at the finish line made things unbearable. Having to wait in line for a half hour behind 5k walkers for food and drink was inconceivable (the extreme heat and humidity, I grant, were not to be blamed on the organization). The so-called expo was a joke (2 or 3 stands?). The medal was unsightly. The absolute worst, though, was the race officials who actually stopped runners near the finish line to allow a TV news truck back out of a parking lot. The scheduling was a nightmare (Quebec City's great marathon is held three weeks earlier). And this was to be a return of the organization that actually respected participants? Give me a break!
2.0

By: Robert D.

Posted: September 21, 2003

Patchwork course, horrible organization

The people putting this marathon together simply didn't know what to do - as if their only concerns were to 1) add a marathon distance course to a bunch of other (clashing) activities such as cycling, in-line skating and a traditional 10K race, and 2) to make things harder for Quebec's only other marathon, the Marathon des Deux Rives in Quebec City, held just 3 weeks earlier. Boring course, no food, no gels, no 'Ade, practically no volunteers and few and often times confusing Km signs along the course. Runners had to deal with runners on other distances, cyclists and skaters, creating an unsafe environment. Runners were simply extras in this horror film. Never again!
1.0

By: louise b.

Posted: September 17, 2003

Adjustments needed!!!!

First off, the 1/2 marathon leaves too close after the full marathon... because of the narrow course at the beginning, marathoners must get out of the way to let them pass. At the end, another nightmare; people are walking in the narrow space reserved for the runners and the marathoners must go around them to the finish. The course was not bad, but what was that horrible smell around the half mark!? The organization at the end was poor... what were they thinking, after running in record heat, making us wait in line for at least 20 minutes to get something to drink!? Disgusted.
2.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide